From e62a02d5af90e243bf5d84fdf2ac3567e94bdf58 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Rumpf <andreas@andreas-laptop>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:13:14 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] versioning for GTK wrappers

---
 lib/wrappers/gtk/glib2.nim | 6 +++---
 lib/wrappers/gtk/gtk2.nim  | 2 +-
 web/question.txt           | 5 ++---
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/wrappers/gtk/glib2.nim b/lib/wrappers/gtk/glib2.nim
index bfa65471ad..d7414cbcb2 100755
--- a/lib/wrappers/gtk/glib2.nim
+++ b/lib/wrappers/gtk/glib2.nim
@@ -6,9 +6,9 @@ when defined(windows):
     gobjectlib = "libgobject-2.0-0.dll"
 else: 
   const 
-    gliblib = "libglib-2.0.so"
-    gmodulelib = "libgmodule-2.0.so"
-    gobjectlib = "libgobject-2.0.so"
+    gliblib = "libglib-2.0.so(|.0)"
+    gmodulelib = "libgmodule-2.0.so(|.0)"
+    gobjectlib = "libgobject-2.0.so(|.0)"
 # gthreadlib = "libgthread-2.0.so"
 
 type 
diff --git a/lib/wrappers/gtk/gtk2.nim b/lib/wrappers/gtk/gtk2.nim
index 987c40f696..f1690048b9 100755
--- a/lib/wrappers/gtk/gtk2.nim
+++ b/lib/wrappers/gtk/gtk2.nim
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ elif defined(darwin):
   # linklib atk-1.0.0
 else: 
   const 
-    lib = "libgtk-x11-2.0.so"
+    lib = "libgtk-x11-2.0.so(|.0)"
 
 const 
   MAX_COMPOSE_LEN* = 7
diff --git a/web/question.txt b/web/question.txt
index 6cd44391d0..bce9c0c74b 100755
--- a/web/question.txt
+++ b/web/question.txt
@@ -53,10 +53,9 @@ and their interactions are subject to change.
 How fast is Nimrod?
 -------------------
 Benchmarks have not been ported yet and support for threads is missing. But in
-the worst case, you can get exactly the same performance as in C if you decide 
+the worst case, you can get the same performance as in C if you decide 
 to write as low-level Nimrod code as C requires you to do. That said the only
-overhead Nimrod has over C is the GC which has been tuned for years (and is 
-significantly faster than the Boehm GC).
+overhead Nimrod has over C is the GC which has been tuned for years.
 
 
 Compilation