fixes another effect inference bug [backport:1.6] (#19100)

* fixes another effect inference bug [backport:1.6]

tests/effects/tnestedprocs.nim

@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+discard """
+  cmd: "nim check --hints:off $file"
+  nimout: '''tnestedprocs.nim(27, 8) Error: 'inner' can have side effects
+> tnestedprocs.nim(29, 13) Hint: 'inner' calls `.sideEffect` 'outer2'
+>> tnestedprocs.nim(26, 6) Hint: 'outer2' called by 'inner'
+
+tnestedprocs.nim(45, 8) Error: 'inner' can have side effects
+> tnestedprocs.nim(47, 13) Hint: 'inner' calls `.sideEffect` 'outer6'
+>> tnestedprocs.nim(44, 6) Hint: 'outer6' called by 'inner'
+
+tnestedprocs.nim(58, 41) Error: type mismatch: got <proc ()> but expected 'proc (){.closure, noSideEffect.}'
+  Pragma mismatch: got '{..}', but expected '{.noSideEffect.}'.
+'''
+  errormsg: "type mismatch: got <proc ()> but expected 'proc (){.closure, noSideEffect.}'"
+"""
+{.experimental: "strictEffects".}
+proc outer {.noSideEffect.} =
+  proc inner(p: int) =
+    if p == 0:
+      outer()
+
+  inner(4)
+
+outer()
+
+proc outer2 =
+  proc inner(p: int) {.noSideEffect.} =
+    if p == 0:
+      outer2()
+
+  inner(4)
+
+outer2()
+
+proc outer3(p: int) {.noSideEffect.} =
+  proc inner(p: int) {.noSideEffect.} =
+    if p == 0:
+      p.outer3()
+
+  inner(4)
+
+outer3(5)
+
+proc outer6 =
+  proc inner(p: int) {.noSideEffect.} =
+    if p == 0:
+      outer6()
+
+  inner(4)
+  echo "bad"
+
+outer6()
+
+
+proc outer4 =
+  proc inner(p: int) {.noSideEffect.} =
+    if p == 0:
+      let x: proc () {.noSideEffect.} = outer4
+      x()
+
+  inner(4)
+
+outer4()

tests/pragmas/tcompile_pragma.nim

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 discard """
   output: '''34'''
+  joinable: false
 """
 
 {.compile("cfunction.c", "-DNUMBER_HERE=34").}