fixes#24863, refs #23787 and #24316
Working off the minimized example, my understanding of the issue is: `n`
captures `r` as `:envP.r1` where `:envP` is the environment of `b`, then
`proc () = n()` does the lambda lifting of `n` again (which isn't done
if the `proc ()` is marked `{.closure.}`, hence the workaround) which
then captures the `:envP` as another field inside the `:envP`, so it
generates `:envP.:envP_2.r1` but the `.:envP_2` field is `nil`, so it
causes a segfault.
The problem is that the capture of `r` in `n` is done inside
`detectCapturedVars` for the surrounding closure iterator: inner procs
are not special cased and traversed as regular nodes, so it thinks it's
inside the iterator and generates a field access of `:envP` freely. The
lambda lifting version of `detectCapturedVars` ignores inner procs and
works off of symbol uses (anonymous iterator and lambda declarations
pretend their symbol is used).
As a naive solution, closure iterators now also ignore inner proc
declarations same as `lambdalifting.detectCapturedVars`, but unlike it
they also don't do anything for the inner proc symbols. Lambdalifting
seems to properly handle the lifted variables but in the worst case we
can also make sure `closureiters.detectCapturedVars` traverses inner
procs by marking every local of the closure iter used in them as needing
lifting (but not doing the lifting). This does not seem necessary for
now so it's not done (was done and reverted in [this
commit](9bb39a9259)),
but regressions are still possible
The first commit reverts the revert of #23787.
The second fixes lambdalifting in convolutedly nested
closures/closureiters. This is considered to be the reason of #24094,
though I can't tell for sure, as I was not able to reproduce #24094 for
complicated but irrelevant reasons. Therefore I ask @jmgomez, @metagn or
anyone who could reproduce it to try it again with this PR.
I would suggest this PR to not be squashed if possible, as the history
is already messy enough.
Some theory behind the lambdalifting fix:
- A closureiter that captures anything outside its body will always have
`:up` in its env. This property is now used as a trigger to lift any
proc that captures such a closureiter.
- Instantiating a closureiter involves filling out its `:up`, which was
previously done incorrectly. The fixed algorithm is to use "current" env
if it is the owner of the iter declaration, or traverse through `:up`s
of env param until the common ancestor is found.
---------
Co-authored-by: Andreas Rumpf <rumpf_a@web.de>
