fixes#25312
Tuple expressions `(a, b, c)` can be either types or values depending on
if their elements are typedescs or values, this is checked by checking
if the type of the element is `tyTypeDesc`. However when an
`skGenericParam` symbol is semchecked by `semSym` it is given its own
`tyGenericParam` type rather than a `tyTypeDesc` type, this seems to be
necessary for signatures to allow wildcard generic params passed to
static constrained generic params (tested in #25315). The reason
`semSym` is called is that `semGeneric` for generic invocations calls
`matches` which sems its arguments like normal expressions.
To deal with this, an expression of type `tyGenericParam` and with a
`skGenericParam` sym is allowed as a type in the tuple expression. A
problem is that this might consider a value with a wildcard generic
param type as a type. But this is a very niche problem, and I'm not sure
how to check for this. `skGenericParam` symbols stay as idents when
semchecked so it can't be checked that the node is an `skGenericParam`
symbol. It could be checked that it's an ident but I don't know how
robust this is. And maybe there is another way to refer to a wildcard
generic param type instead of just its symbol, i.e. another kind of
node.
This also makes #5647 finally work but a test case for that can be added
after.
(cherry picked from commit 44d2472b08)
fixes#22305
It seems that the generic type is cached somehow so that no hooks are
instantiated for the generic type. There are only hooks for the
instantiated type. When `lambdalifting` tries to create type bounds for
the generic type, it cannot either find the instantiated hooks or
instantiate the generic hooks since it lacks `SemContext`. It can use
hooks for the instantiated type in this case
(cherry picked from commit 1da0dc74d9)
The forward declarations cause `Exception` to be inferred - also,
`llrecv` is an internal implementation detail and the type of the
received item is controlled by generics, thus the ValueError raised
there seems out of place for the generic api.
(cherry picked from commit 91febf1f4c)
Returning or yielding from a closureiter must restore "external"
exception, but `popCurrentException` from `blockLeaveActions` was
getting in the way. So now `blockLeaveActions` doesn't emit
`popCurrentException` for returns in closureiters. I'm not a fan of this
"abstraction leakage", but don't see a better solution yet. Any input is
much appreciated.
---------
Co-authored-by: Andreas Rumpf <araq4k@proton.me>
(cherry picked from commit 6656084004)
fixes#25007
```nim
proc setLengthSeqUninit(s: PGenericSeq, typ: PNimType, newLen: int, isTrivial: bool): PGenericSeq {.
compilerRtl.} =
```
In this added function, only the line `zeroMem(dataPointer(result,
elemAlign, elemSize, newLen), (result.len-%newLen) *% elemSize)` is
removed from `proc setLengthSeqV2` when enlarging a sequence.
JS and VM versions simply use `setLen`.
(cherry picked from commit 611b8bbf67)
fixes#19728
don't zero-filling memory for "trivial types" without destructor in
refc. I tested locally with internal apis.
(cherry picked from commit b421d0f8ee)
fixes#25284
```nim
proc m2() =
let v {.global, used.}: string = f2(f2("123"))
```
transform lifted `.global`statements in the top level scope
(cherry picked from commit 9becd1453d)
While `a.push.apply(a, b)` is better for performance than the previous
`a = a.concat(b)` due to the fact that it doesn't create a new array,
there is a pretty big problem with it: depending on the JS engine, if
the second array is too long, it can [cause a
crash](https://tanaikech.github.io/2020/04/20/limitation-of-array.prototype.push.apply-under-v8-for-google-apps-script/)
due to the function `push` taking too many arguments. This has
unfortunately been what the codegen produces since 1.4.0 (commit
707367e1ca).
So string addition is now moved to a compilerproc that just uses a `for`
loop. From what I can tell this is the most compatible and the fastest.
Only potential problem compared to `concat` etc is with aliasing, i.e.
adding an array to itself, but I'm guessing it's enough that the length
from before the iteration is used, since it can only grow. The test
checks for aliased nim strings but I don't know if there's an extra
protection for them.
(cherry picked from commit 839cbeb371)
fixes#25251
enforce a copy if the arg is a deref of a lent pointer since the arg
could be a temporary that will go out of scope
(cherry picked from commit 6f73094263)
fixes#25008
It seems that `semOverloadedCall` evaluates the same node twice using
`tryConstExpr` in order for `efExplain` to print all the diagnostic
output. The problem is that `tryConstExpr` has side effects, i.e., it
changes the slot index of variables after VM execution.
(cherry picked from commit 130eac2f93)
fixes#25123; fixes#11862
follow up https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/24442
ref https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/24441
> To fix this, fields from inactive branches are now detected in
semmacrosanity.annotateType (called in fixupTypeAfterEval) and marked to
prevent the codegen of their assignments. In
https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/24441 these fields were excluded
from the resulting node, but this causes issues when the node is
directly supposed to go back into the VM, for example as const values. I
don't know if this is the only case where this happens, so I wasn't sure
about how to keep that implementation working.
Object variants fields coming from inactive branches from VM are now
flagged `nfPreventCg`. We can ignore them, as done by the C backends.
(cherry picked from commit 5abd21dfa5)
fixes#25208
```nim
type Conf = object
val: int
const defaultConf = Conf(val: 123)
static:
var conf: Conf
conf = defaultConf
```
```nim
# opcLdConst is now always valid. We produce the necessary copy in the
# assignments now:
```
A `opcLdConst` is generated for `defaultConf` in `conf = defaultConf`.
According to the comment above, we need to handle the copy for
assignments of `opcLdConst`
(cherry picked from commit f009ea6c3e)
fixes#25046
```nim
proc makeiter(v: string): iterator(): string =
return iterator(): string =
yield v
# loops
for c in makeiter("test")():
echo "loops ", c
```
becomes
```nim
var temp = makeiter("test")
for c in temp():
echo "loops ", c
```
for closures that might have side effects
(cherry picked from commit 31d64b57d5)
fixes#25205fixes#14873
```nim
type
SysLockObj {.importc: "pthread_mutex_t", pure, final,
header: """#include <sys/types.h>
#include <pthread.h>""", byref.} = object
when defined(linux) and defined(amd64):
abi: array[40 div sizeof(clong), clong]
```
Before this PR, in refc, `resetLoc` generates field assignments for each
fields of `importc` object. But the field `abi` is not a genuine field,
which doesn't exits in the struct. We could use `zeroMem` to reset the
memory if not leave it alone
(cherry picked from commit 02609f1872)
fixes#25205fixes#14873
```nim
type
SysLockObj {.importc: "pthread_mutex_t", pure, final,
header: """#include <sys/types.h>
#include <pthread.h>""", byref.} = object
when defined(linux) and defined(amd64):
abi: array[40 div sizeof(clong), clong]
```
Before this PR, in refc, `resetLoc` generates field assignments for each
fields of `importc` object. But the field `abi` is not a genuine field,
which doesn't exits in the struct. We could use `zeroMem` to reset the
memory if not leave it alone
(cherry picked from commit 02609f1872)
fixes#24760
I tried `incl` `tfHasAsgn` to nontrivial assignment, but that solution
seems to break too many things. Instead, in this PR, `passCopyToSink`
now checks nontrivial assignment
(cherry picked from commit e958f4a3cd)
Because `prevFields` and `currentFields` have been already quoted by
`'`, no need to add another.
The error message was
```
The fields ''x'' and ''y'' cannot be initialized together, because they are from conflicting branches in the case object.
```
(cherry picked from commit cdb750c962)
fixes#24844
it may not be used in other places except in `genTraverseProc`,
we have to generate a `typedesc` for this case, not a weak `typedec`
(cherry picked from commit a77d1cc6c1)
fixes#25117
errors on `requiresInit` of `result` if it is used before
initialization. Otherwise
```nim
# prevent superfluous warnings about the same variable:
a.init.add s.id
```
It produces a warning, and this line prevents it from being recognized
by the `requiresInit` check in `trackProc`
(cherry picked from commit c8456eacd5)
Follow up to https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/25126
It changed `formatSize` outputs from some inputs, so some of existing
test code related to it need to be updated.
Sorry, I didn't know `tests/destructor/tnewruntime_strutils.nim` has
tests calls `formatSize`.
(cherry picked from commit 8ea8755cc0)
