fixes#23186
As explained in #23186, generics can transform `genericProc[int]` into a
call `` `[]`(genericProc, int) `` which causes a problem when
`genericProc` is resemmed, since it is not a resolved generic proc. `[]`
needs unresolved generic procs since `mArrGet` also handles explicit
generic instantiations, so delay the resolved generic proc check to
`semFinishOperands` which is intentionally not called for `mArrGet`.
The root issue for
[t6137](https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/blob/devel/tests/generics/t6137.nim)
is also fixed (because this change breaks it otherwise), the compiler
doesn't consider the possibility that an assigned generic param can be
an unresolved static value (note the line `if t.kind == tyStatic: s.ast
= t.n` below the change in sigmatch), now it properly errors that it
couldn't instantiate it as it would for a type param. ~~The change in
semtypinst is just for symmetry with the code above it which also gives
a `cannot instantiate` error, it may or may not be necessary/correct.~~
Now removed, I don't think it was correct.
Still possible that this has unintended consequences.
(cherry picked from commit e8092a5470)
fixes#22605, separated from #22744
This marks symbol captures in macro calls in generic contexts as
`nfOpenSym`, which means if there is a new symbol in the local
instantiatied body during instantiation time, this symbol replaces the
captured symbol. We have to be careful not to consider symbols outside
of the instantiation body during instantiation, because this will leak
symbols from the instantiation context scope rather than the original
declaration scope. This is done by checking if the local context owner
(maybe should be the symbol of the proc currently getting instantiated
instead? not sure how to get this) is the same as or a parent owner of
the owner of the replacement candidate symbol.
This solution is distinct from the symchoice mechanisms which we
originally assumed had to be related, if this assumption was wrong it
would explain why this solution took so long to arrive at.
(cherry picked from commit 941659581a)
fixes#22597
```nim
proc autoToOpenArray*[T](s: Slice[T]): openArray[T] =
echo "here twice"
result = toOpenArray(s.p, s.first, s.last)
```
For functions returning openarray types, `fixupCall` creates a temporary
variable to store the return value: `let tmp = autoToOpenArray()`. But
`genOpenArrayConv` cannot handle openarray assignements with side
effects. It should have stored the right part of the assignment first
instead of calling the right part twice.
(cherry picked from commit d44b0b1869)
fixes#23200, fixes#18866
not turned to `tyUntyped`. This had the side effect that anything
previously bound to `tyAnything` in the proc type match was then bound
to the proc return type, which is wrong since we don't know the proc
return type even if we know the expected parameter types (`tyUntyped`
also [does not care about its previous bindings in
`typeRel`](ab4278d217/compiler/sigmatch.nim (L1059-L1061))
maybe for this reason).
Now we mark `tyAnything` return types for routines as `tfRetType` [as
done for other meta return
types](18b5fb256d/compiler/semtypes.nim (L1451)),
and ignore bindings to `tyAnything` + `tfRetType` types in `semtypinst`.
On top of this, we reset the type relation in `paramTypesMatch` only
after creating the instantiation (instead of trusting
`isInferred`/`isInferredConvertible` before creating the instantiation),
using the same mechanism that `isBothMetaConvertible` uses.
This fixes the issues as well as making the disabled t15386_2 test
introduced in #21065 work. As seen in the changes for the other tests,
the error messages give an obscure `proc (a: GenericParam): auto` now,
but it does give the correct error that the overload doesn't match
instead of matching the overload pre-emptively and expecting a specific
return type.
tsugar had to be changed due to #16906, which is the problem where
`void` is not inferred in the case where `result` was never touched.
(cherry picked from commit f46f26e79a)
…var/let symbols
fixes#22939fixes#16890
Besides, it was applied to let/const/var with pragmas, now it is
universally applied.
```nim
{.push exportc.}
proc foo =
let bar = 12
echo bar
{.pop.}
```
For example, the `bar` variable will be affected by `exportc`.
(cherry picked from commit cecaf9c56b)
inputLen may end up as 0 in the loop if the input string only includes
trailing characters. e.g. without the patch, decode(" ") would panic.
(cherry picked from commit 30cf570af9)
fixes#23399
The new case introduced in #21657 is triggered by `efWantStmt` but the
`when` statement doesn't normally propagate this flag, so propagate it
when the `semCheck` param in `semWhen` is true which happens when the
`when` statement is `efWhenStmt` anyway.
(cherry picked from commit fb6c805568)
fixes#22284fixes#22282
```
Error: j(uRef, proc (config: F; sources: auto) {.raises: [].} = discard ) can raise an unlisted exception: Exception
```
The problem is that `n.typ.n` contains the effectList which shouldn't
appear in the parameter of a function defintion. We could not simply use
`n.typ.n` as `n[paramsPos]`. The effect lists should be stripped away
anyway.
(cherry picked from commit 320311182c)
ref #23354
The new move analyzer requires types that have the tfAsgn flag
(otherwise `lastRead` will return true); tfAsgn is included when the
destructor is not trival. But it should consider the assignement for
objects in this case because objects might have a trival destructors but
it's the assignement that matters when it is passed to sink parameters.
(cherry picked from commit 572b0b67ff)
This also prevents unwanted `raises: [ValueError]` effects from bubbling
up from correct format strings which makes `fmt` broadly unusable with
`raises`.
The old runtime-based `formatValue` overloads are kept for
backwards-compatibility, should anyone be using runtime format strings.
---------
Co-authored-by: Andreas Rumpf <rumpf_a@web.de>
(cherry picked from commit a1e41930f8)
fixes#22909
required by https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/23267
```nim
proc foo: string =
assert false
result = ""
```
In the function `foo`, `assert false` raises an exception, which can
cause `result` to be uninitialized if the default result initialization
is optimized out
(cherry picked from commit 7d9721007c)
fixes#23247closes#23251 (which accounts for why the openarray type is lifted
because ops are lifted for openarray conversions)
related: https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/18713
It seems to me that openarray doesn't own the data, so it cannot destroy
itself. The same case should be applied to
https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/issues/19435. It shouldn't be destroyed
even openarray can have a destructor. A cleanup will be followed for
https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/19723 if it makes sense.
According to https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/12073, it lifts
destructor for openarray when openarray is sunk into the function, when
means `sink openarray` owns the data and needs to destroy it. In other
cases, destructor shouldn't be lifted for `openarray` in the first place
and it shouldn't destroy the data if it doesn't own it.
---------
Co-authored-by: Andreas Rumpf <rumpf_a@web.de>
(cherry picked from commit 24a606902a)
fixes#17163, refs #23204
Types that aren't `tyRange` and are bigger than 16 bits, so `int32`,
`uint64`, `int` etc, are disallowed as array index range types.
`tyRange` is excluded because the max array size is backend independent
(except for the specific size of `high(uint64)` which crashes the
compiler) and so there should still be an escape hatch for people who
want bigger arrays.
(cherry picked from commit 3ab8b6b2cf)
fixes#23177
`changeType` doesn't perform range checks to see if the expression fits
the new type [if the old type is the same as the new
type](62d8ca4306/compiler/semexprs.nim (L633)).
For `nkIntLit`, we previously set the type to the concrete base of the
expected type first, then call `changeType`, which works for things like
range types but not bare types of smaller bit size like `int8`. Now we
don't set the type (so the type is nil), and `changeType` performs the
range check when the type is unset (nil).
(cherry picked from commit 00be8f287a)
fixes#22775
It's pre-existing that [`prepareOperand` doesn't typecheck expressions
which have
types](a4f3bf3742/compiler/sigmatch.nim (L2444)).
Templates can take typed subscript expressions, transform them into
calls to `[]`, and then have this `[]` not be resolved later if the
expression is nested inside of a call argument, which leaks an untyped
expression past semantic analysis. To prevent this, don't transform any
typed subscript expressions into calls to `[]` in templates. Ditto for
curly subscripts (with `{}`) and assignments to subscripts and curly
subscripts (with `[]=` and `{}=`).
(cherry picked from commit 62d8ca4306)
This code will crash `check`/`nimsuggest` since the `ra` register is
uninitialised
```nim
import macros
static:
discard parseExpr("'")
```
Now it assigns an empty node so that it has something
Testament changes were so I could properly write a test. It would pass
even with a segfault since it could find the error
(cherry picked from commit db9d8003b0)
Closes#14329
Marks `macros.error` as `.noreturn` so that it can be used in
expressions. This also fixes the issue that occurred in #19659 where a
stmt that could be an expression (Due to having `discardable` procs at
the end of other branches) would believe a `noreturn` proc is returning
the same type e.g.
```nim
proc bar(): int {.discardable.} = discard
if true: bar()
else: quit(0) # Says that quit is of type `int` and needs to be used/discarded except it actually has no return type
```
(cherry picked from commit b3b87f0f8a)
While looking at the CI I noticed that there's a couple false positives
for `case` statements that cannot be checked for exhaustiveness since my
changes, this should resolve them.
---------
Co-authored-by: SirOlaf <>
(cherry picked from commit 9140f8e221)
…tes invalid C identifiers
fixes#22913fixes#12985 differently
`{.push.} now does not apply to generic instantiations`
(cherry picked from commit 5dafcf4957)
In this PR, the following changes were made:
1. Replaced `raise newException(OSError, osErrorMsg(errno))` in batches
with `raiseOSError(errcode)`.
2. Replaced `newException(OSError, osErrorMsg(errno))` in batches with
`newOSError(errcode)`.
There are still some places that have not been replaced. After checking,
they are not system errors in the traditional sense.
```nim
proc dlclose(lib: LibHandle) =
raise newException(OSError, "dlclose not implemented on Nintendo Switch!")
```
```nim
if not fileExists(result) and not dirExists(result):
# consider using: `raiseOSError(osLastError(), result)`
raise newException(OSError, "file '" & result & "' does not exist")
```
```nim
proc paramStr*(i: int): string =
raise newException(OSError, "paramStr is not implemented on Genode")
```
(cherry picked from commit 39fbd30513)
Close#22826
I am not sure why this code skips generic insts, so letting CI tell me.
Update: It has told me nothing. Maybe someone knows during review.
Issue itself seems to be that the generic instance is skipped thus it
ends up being just `float` which makes it use the wrong generic instance
of the proc because it matches the one in cache
---------
Co-authored-by: SirOlaf <>
(cherry picked from commit c13c48500b)
