fixes#23002, fixes#22841, refs comments in #23097
When an identifier is ambiguous in scope (i.e. multiple imports contain
symbols with the same name), attempt resolving it through type inference
(by creating a symchoice). To do this efficiently, `qualifiedLookUp` had
to be broken up so that `semExpr` can access the ambiguous candidates
directly (now obtained directly via `lookUpCandidates`).
This fixes the linked issues, but an example like:
```nim
let on = 123
{.warning[ProveInit]: on.}
```
will still fail, since `on` is unambiguously the local `let` symbol here
(this is also true for `proc on` but `proc` symbols generate symchoices
anyway).
Type symbols are not considered to not confuse the type inference. This
includes the change in sigmatch, up to this point symchoices with
nonoverloadable symbols could be created, they just wouldn't be
considered during disambiguation. Now every proper symbol except types
are considered in disambiguation, so the correct symbols must be picked
during the creation of the symchoice node. I remember there being a
violating case of this in the compiler, but this was very likely fixed
by excluding type symbols as CI seems to have found no issues.
The pure enum ambiguity test was disabled because ambiguous pure enums
now behave like overloadable enums with this behavior, so we get a
longer error message for `echo amb` like `type mismatch: got <MyEnum |
OtherEnum> but expected T`
Continued from #23096 which was reverted due to breaking a package and
failing docgen tests. Docgen should now work, but ~~a PR is still
pending for the package: https://github.com/SciNim/Unchained/pull/45~~
has been merged
refs #23091, especially post merge comments
Unsure if `experimental` and `bind` are the perfect constructs to use
but they seem to get the job done here. Symbol nodes do not get marked
`nfOpenSym` if the `bind` statement is used for their symbol, and
`nfOpenSym` nodes do not get replaced by new local symbols if the
experimental switch is not enabled in the local context (meaning it also
works with `push experimental`). However this incurs a warning as the
fact that the node is marked `nfOpenSym` means we did not `bind` it, so
we might want to do that or turn on the experimental switch if we didn't
intend to bind it.
The experimental switch name is arbitrary and could be changed.
---------
Co-authored-by: Andreas Rumpf <rumpf_a@web.de>
This code will crash `check`/`nimsuggest` since the `ra` register is
uninitialised
```nim
import macros
static:
discard parseExpr("'")
```
Now it assigns an empty node so that it has something
Testament changes were so I could properly write a test. It would pass
even with a segfault since it could find the error
fixes#22605, separated from #22744
This marks symbol captures in macro calls in generic contexts as
`nfOpenSym`, which means if there is a new symbol in the local
instantiatied body during instantiation time, this symbol replaces the
captured symbol. We have to be careful not to consider symbols outside
of the instantiation body during instantiation, because this will leak
symbols from the instantiation context scope rather than the original
declaration scope. This is done by checking if the local context owner
(maybe should be the symbol of the proc currently getting instantiated
instead? not sure how to get this) is the same as or a parent owner of
the owner of the replacement candidate symbol.
This solution is distinct from the symchoice mechanisms which we
originally assumed had to be related, if this assumption was wrong it
would explain why this solution took so long to arrive at.
Closes#14329
Marks `macros.error` as `.noreturn` so that it can be used in
expressions. This also fixes the issue that occurred in #19659 where a
stmt that could be an expression (Due to having `discardable` procs at
the end of other branches) would believe a `noreturn` proc is returning
the same type e.g.
```nim
proc bar(): int {.discardable.} = discard
if true: bar()
else: quit(0) # Says that quit is of type `int` and needs to be used/discarded except it actually has no return type
```
fixes#22227
rationale:
- `3u - 4u` is supported why not`3u.toRational - 4u.toRational`
- all of rationals' api is on SomeInteger, looks like unsigned is
declared as supported
- math on unsigned rationals is meaningful and useful.
When running `check`/`suggest` in a file with an invalid user pragma
like
```nim
{.pragma foo: test.}
```
It will continue to try and process it which leads to the compiler
running into a `FieldDefect`
```
fatal.nim(53) sysFatal
Error: unhandled exception: field 'sons' is not accessible for type 'TNode' using 'kind = nkIdent' [FieldDefect]
```
This makes it instead bail out trying to process the user pragma if its
invalid
While looking at the CI I noticed that there's a couple false positives
for `case` statements that cannot be checked for exhaustiveness since my
changes, this should resolve them.
---------
Co-authored-by: SirOlaf <>
**TODO**
- [x] fixes changelog
With the new option `nimPreviewVtables`, `methods` are confined in the
same module where the type of the first parameter is defined
- [x] make it opt in after CI checks its feasibility
## In the following-up PRs
- [ ] in the following PRs, refactor code into a more efficient one
- [ ] cpp needs special treatments since it cannot embed array in light
of the preceding limits: ref
https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/20977#discussion_r1035528927; we
can support cpp backends with vtable implementations later on the
comprise that uses indirect vtable access
---------
Co-authored-by: Andreas Rumpf <rumpf_a@web.de>
Currently running `nimsuggest`/`check` on this code causes the compiler
to raise an exception
```nim
type
Test = enum
A = 9.0
```
```
assertions.nim(34) raiseAssert
Error: unhandled exception: int128.nim(69, 11) `arg.sdata(3) == 0` out of range [AssertionDefect]
```
Issue was the compiler still trying to get the ordinal value even if it
wasn't an ordinal
fixes#22286
ref https://forum.nim-lang.org/t/10642
For backwards compatibilities, we might need to keep the changes under a
preview compiler flag. Let's see how many packags it break.
**TODO** in the following PRs
- [ ] Turn the `var T` destructors warning into an error with
`nimPreviewNonVarDestructor`
---------
Co-authored-by: Andreas Rumpf <rumpf_a@web.de>
…var/let symbols
fixes#22939fixes#16890
Besides, it was applied to let/const/var with pragmas, now it is
universally applied.
```nim
{.push exportc.}
proc foo =
let bar = 12
echo bar
{.pop.}
```
For example, the `bar` variable will be affected by `exportc`.
In this PR, the following changes were made:
1. Replaced `raise newException(OSError, osErrorMsg(errno))` in batches
with `raiseOSError(errcode)`.
2. Replaced `newException(OSError, osErrorMsg(errno))` in batches with
`newOSError(errcode)`.
There are still some places that have not been replaced. After checking,
they are not system errors in the traditional sense.
```nim
proc dlclose(lib: LibHandle) =
raise newException(OSError, "dlclose not implemented on Nintendo Switch!")
```
```nim
if not fileExists(result) and not dirExists(result):
# consider using: `raiseOSError(osLastError(), result)`
raise newException(OSError, "file '" & result & "' does not exist")
```
```nim
proc paramStr*(i: int): string =
raise newException(OSError, "paramStr is not implemented on Genode")
```
Close#22826
I am not sure why this code skips generic insts, so letting CI tell me.
Update: It has told me nothing. Maybe someone knows during review.
Issue itself seems to be that the generic instance is skipped thus it
ends up being just `float` which makes it use the wrong generic instance
of the proc because it matches the one in cache
---------
Co-authored-by: SirOlaf <>
