mirror of
https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim.git
synced 2026-01-03 03:32:32 +00:00
- `system.substr` now uses `copymem` when available, introducing a small
template for nimvm detection (#12517 #12518)
- Docs are updated to clarify behaviour on out-of-bounds input
- Runnable examples cover more edge cases and do not repeat between
overloads
- Docs now explain the difference between overloads
What bothers me is that the `substr*(a: openArray[char]): string =`
which was added by @beef331 is practically an implementation of #14810,
which is just a conversion from `openArray` to `string` but somehow it
ended up being a `substr` overload, even though its behaviour is totally
different, _the "substringing" is performed by a previous step_
(conversion to openArray) and the bounds are not checked. I'm not sure
it's that great for overloads to differ in subtle ways so much.
What are the cases that `substr` covers now, that prohibit renaming it
to `toString` (or something like that)?
(cherry picked from commit b82d7e8ba1)