From 62d232d798fff25597b6e3591c6a178c32fa440e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: gingerBill Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 22:59:00 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Correct `ExactValue_Pointer` --- src/exact_value.cpp | 17 +++++++++--- src/parser.cpp | 63 --------------------------------------------- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/exact_value.cpp b/src/exact_value.cpp index fd90278e5..3dae96853 100644 --- a/src/exact_value.cpp +++ b/src/exact_value.cpp @@ -630,6 +630,9 @@ void match_exact_values(ExactValue *x, ExactValue *y) { case ExactValue_Bool: case ExactValue_String: case ExactValue_Quaternion: + case ExactValue_Pointer: + case ExactValue_Procedure: + case ExactValue_Typeid: return; case ExactValue_Integer: @@ -671,9 +674,6 @@ void match_exact_values(ExactValue *x, ExactValue *y) { return; } break; - - case ExactValue_Procedure: - return; } compiler_error("match_exact_values: How'd you get here? Invalid ExactValueKind %d", x->kind); @@ -932,6 +932,17 @@ bool compare_exact_values(TokenKind op, ExactValue x, ExactValue y) { break; } + case ExactValue_Pointer: { + switch (op) { + case Token_CmpEq: return x.value_pointer == y.value_pointer; + case Token_NotEq: return x.value_pointer != y.value_pointer; + case Token_Lt: return x.value_pointer < y.value_pointer; + case Token_LtEq: return x.value_pointer <= y.value_pointer; + case Token_Gt: return x.value_pointer > y.value_pointer; + case Token_GtEq: return x.value_pointer >= y.value_pointer; + } + } + case ExactValue_Typeid: switch (op) { case Token_CmpEq: return are_types_identical(x.value_typeid, y.value_typeid); diff --git a/src/parser.cpp b/src/parser.cpp index c214df782..9659e8c18 100644 --- a/src/parser.cpp +++ b/src/parser.cpp @@ -3013,69 +3013,6 @@ i32 token_precedence(AstFile *f, TokenKind t) { return 0; } -// Ast *parse_binary_expr(AstFile *f, bool lhs, i32 prec_in) { -// Ast *expr = parse_unary_expr(f, lhs); -// for (i32 prec = token_precedence(f, f->curr_token.kind); prec >= prec_in; prec--) { -// for (;;) { -// Token op = f->curr_token; -// i32 op_prec = token_precedence(f, op.kind); -// if (op_prec != prec) { -// // NOTE(bill): This will also catch operators that are not valid "binary" operators -// break; -// } -// Token prev = f->prev_token; -// switch (op.kind) { -// case Token_if: -// case Token_when: -// if (prev.pos.line < op.pos.line) { -// // NOTE(bill): Check to see if the `if` or `when` is on the same line of the `lhs` condition -// goto loop_end; -// } -// break; -// } -// expect_operator(f); // NOTE(bill): error checks too - -// if (op.kind == Token_Question) { -// Ast *cond = expr; -// // Token_Question -// Ast *x = parse_expr(f, lhs); -// Token token_c = expect_token(f, Token_Colon); -// Ast *y = parse_expr(f, lhs); -// expr = ast_ternary_if_expr(f, x, cond, y); -// } else if (op.kind == Token_if || op.kind == Token_when) { -// Ast *x = expr; -// Ast *cond = parse_expr(f, lhs); -// Token tok_else = expect_token(f, Token_else); -// Ast *y = parse_expr(f, lhs); - -// switch (op.kind) { -// case Token_if: -// expr = ast_ternary_if_expr(f, x, cond, y); -// break; -// case Token_when: -// expr = ast_ternary_when_expr(f, x, cond, y); -// break; -// } -// } else { -// Ast *right = parse_binary_expr(f, false, prec+1); -// if (right == nullptr) { -// syntax_error(op, "Expected expression on the right-hand side of the binary operator '%.*s'", LIT(op.string)); -// } -// if (op.kind == Token_or_else) { -// // NOTE(bill): easier to handle its logic different with its own AST kind -// expr = ast_or_else_expr(f, expr, op, right); -// } else { -// expr = ast_binary_expr(f, op, expr, right); -// } -// } - -// lhs = false; -// } -// loop_end:; -// } -// return expr; -// } - Ast *parse_binary_expr(AstFile *f, bool lhs, i32 prec_in) { Ast *expr = parse_unary_expr(f, lhs); for (;;) {