Replace RecursiveMutex with a BlockingMutex

This commit is contained in:
gingerBill
2023-01-16 18:05:58 +00:00
parent b289a27c4e
commit 65c0255e7e
3 changed files with 15 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@@ -2547,11 +2547,14 @@ gb_internal lbValue lb_find_ident(lbProcedure *p, lbModule *m, Entity *e, Ast *e
return *found;
}
}
mutex_lock(&m->values_mutex);
defer (mutex_unlock(&m->values_mutex));
auto *found = map_get(&m->values, e);
lbValue *found = nullptr;
mutex_lock(&m->values_mutex);
found = map_get(&m->values, e);
mutex_unlock(&m->values_mutex);
if (found) {
auto v = *found;
// NOTE(bill): This is because pointers are already pointers in LLVM
if (is_type_proc(v.type)) {
@@ -2598,10 +2601,10 @@ gb_internal lbValue lb_find_procedure_value_from_entity(lbModule *m, Entity *e)
e = strip_entity_wrapping(e);
GB_ASSERT(e != nullptr);
lbValue *found = nullptr;
mutex_lock(&m->values_mutex);
defer (mutex_unlock(&m->values_mutex));
auto *found = map_get(&m->values, e);
found = map_get(&m->values, e);
mutex_unlock(&m->values_mutex);
if (found) {
return *found;
}
@@ -2698,11 +2701,10 @@ gb_internal lbValue lb_find_value_from_entity(lbModule *m, Entity *e) {
return lb_find_procedure_value_from_entity(m, e);
}
lbValue *found = nullptr;
mutex_lock(&m->values_mutex);
defer (mutex_unlock(&m->values_mutex));
auto *found = map_get(&m->values, e);
found = map_get(&m->values, e);
mutex_unlock(&m->values_mutex);
if (found) {
return *found;
}