From 8a890fd3d3cc1d11417d1da37bced9ba5715e612 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: gingerBill Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 01:32:35 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Remove `new_and_improved` in the name --- src/check_expr.cpp | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/check_expr.cpp b/src/check_expr.cpp index 9d87ffdea..99017f434 100644 --- a/src/check_expr.cpp +++ b/src/check_expr.cpp @@ -5893,7 +5893,7 @@ gb_internal bool check_named_arguments(CheckerContext *c, Type *type, Slice const &positional_operands, Array const &named_operands, CallArgumentErrorMode show_error_mode, @@ -5963,7 +5963,7 @@ gb_internal bool check_call_arguments_new_and_improved_single(CheckerContext *c, } -gb_internal CallArgumentData check_call_arguments_new_and_improved_proc_group(CheckerContext *c, Operand *operand, Ast *call) { +gb_internal CallArgumentData check_call_arguments_proc_group(CheckerContext *c, Operand *operand, Ast *call) { ast_node(ce, CallExpr, call); GB_ASSERT(ce->split_args != nullptr); @@ -6063,7 +6063,7 @@ gb_internal CallArgumentData check_call_arguments_new_and_improved_proc_group(Ch check_unpack_arguments(c, lhs, lhs_count, &positional_operands, positional_args, is_variadic ? UnpackFlag_IsVariadic : UnpackFlag_None); if (check_named_arguments(c, e->type, named_args, &named_operands, true)) { - check_call_arguments_new_and_improved_single(c, call, operand, + check_call_arguments_single(c, call, operand, e, e->type, positional_operands, named_operands, CallArgumentErrorMode::ShowErrors, @@ -6187,7 +6187,7 @@ gb_internal CallArgumentData check_call_arguments_new_and_improved_proc_group(Ch ctx.allow_polymorphic_types = is_type_polymorphic(pt); ctx.hide_polymorphic_errors = true; - bool is_a_candidate = check_call_arguments_new_and_improved_single(&ctx, call, operand, + bool is_a_candidate = check_call_arguments_single(&ctx, call, operand, p, pt, positional_operands, named_operands, CallArgumentErrorMode::NoErrors, @@ -6363,7 +6363,7 @@ gb_internal CallArgumentData check_call_arguments_new_and_improved_proc_group(Ch Array named_operands = {}; - check_call_arguments_new_and_improved_single(c, call, operand, + check_call_arguments_single(c, call, operand, e, e->type, positional_operands, named_operands, CallArgumentErrorMode::ShowErrors, @@ -6375,7 +6375,7 @@ gb_internal CallArgumentData check_call_arguments_new_and_improved_proc_group(Ch } -gb_internal CallArgumentData check_call_arguments_new_and_improved(CheckerContext *c, Operand *operand, Ast *call) { +gb_internal CallArgumentData check_call_arguments(CheckerContext *c, Operand *operand, Ast *call) { Type *proc_type = nullptr; CallArgumentData data = {}; @@ -6418,7 +6418,7 @@ gb_internal CallArgumentData check_call_arguments_new_and_improved(CheckerContex } if (operand->mode == Addressing_ProcGroup) { - return check_call_arguments_new_and_improved_proc_group(c, operand, call); + return check_call_arguments_proc_group(c, operand, call); } auto positional_operands = array_make(heap_allocator(), 0, positional_args.count); @@ -6473,7 +6473,7 @@ gb_internal CallArgumentData check_call_arguments_new_and_improved(CheckerContex } if (!any_failure) { - check_call_arguments_new_and_improved_single(c, call, operand, + check_call_arguments_single(c, call, operand, nullptr, nullptr, positional_operands, named_operands, CallArgumentErrorMode::ShowErrors, @@ -7045,7 +7045,7 @@ gb_internal ExprKind check_call_expr(CheckerContext *c, Operand *operand, Ast *c } } - CallArgumentData data = check_call_arguments_new_and_improved(c, operand, call); + CallArgumentData data = check_call_arguments(c, operand, call); Type *result_type = data.result_type; gb_zero_item(operand); operand->expr = call;