mirror of
https://github.com/libsdl-org/SDL.git
synced 2025-10-05 01:16:26 +00:00
Windows: NEON detection and intrinsic includes on Visual Studio
Visual Studio doesn't define __ARM_ARCH nor _ARM_NEON, but _M_ARM and _M_ARM64, so SDL_HasNEON() was bypassed. PF_ARM_NEON_INSTRUCTIONS_AVAILABLE doesn't see to be defined (but still works when defined as 19).
This commit is contained in:
@@ -352,8 +352,18 @@ CPU_haveNEON(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* The way you detect NEON is a privileged instruction on ARM, so you have
|
||||
query the OS kernel in a platform-specific way. :/ */
|
||||
#if defined(SDL_CPUINFO_DISABLED) || !defined(__ARM_ARCH)
|
||||
return 0; /* disabled or not an ARM CPU at all. */
|
||||
#if defined(SDL_CPUINFO_DISABLED)
|
||||
return 0; /* disabled */
|
||||
#elif (defined(__WINDOWS__) || defined(__WINRT__)) && (defined(_M_ARM) || defined(_M_ARM64))
|
||||
/* Visual Studio, for ARM, doesn't define __ARM_ARCH. Handle this first. */
|
||||
/* Seems to have been removed */
|
||||
# if !defined(PF_ARM_NEON_INSTRUCTIONS_AVAILABLE)
|
||||
# define PF_ARM_NEON_INSTRUCTIONS_AVAILABLE 19
|
||||
# endif
|
||||
/* All WinRT ARM devices are required to support NEON, but just in case. */
|
||||
return IsProcessorFeaturePresent(PF_ARM_NEON_INSTRUCTIONS_AVAILABLE) != 0;
|
||||
#elif !defined(__ARM_ARCH)
|
||||
return 0; /* not an ARM CPU at all. */
|
||||
#elif __ARM_ARCH >= 8
|
||||
return 1; /* ARMv8 always has non-optional NEON support. */
|
||||
#elif defined(__APPLE__) && (__ARM_ARCH >= 7)
|
||||
@@ -379,9 +389,6 @@ CPU_haveNEON(void)
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#elif (defined(__WINDOWS__) || defined(__WINRT__)) && defined(_M_ARM)
|
||||
/* All WinRT ARM devices are required to support NEON, but just in case. */
|
||||
return IsProcessorFeaturePresent(PF_ARM_NEON_INSTRUCTIONS_AVAILABLE) != 0;
|
||||
#else
|
||||
#warning SDL_HasNEON is not implemented for this ARM platform. Write me.
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user