These can be unambiguously invoked in certain parser states, and as such
we need to handle them. In real world use they are extremely rare, hence
the branch hint. Without this, we get illegal behavior by trying to cast
the value to the 7-bit C0 enum.
This adds a new formatter that can be used with standard Zig `{f}`
formatting that emits any portion of the terminal screen as VT
sequences. In addition to simply styling, this can emit the entire
terminal/screen state such as cursor positions, active style, terminal
modes, etc.
To do this, I've extracted all formatting to a dedicated `formatter`
package within `terminal`. This handles all formatting types (currently
plaintext and VT formatting, but can imagine things like HTML in the
future). Presently, we have "formatting" split out across a variety of
places in Terminal, Screen, PageList, and Page. I didn't remove this
code yet but I intend to unify it all on formatter in the future.
This also doesn't expose this functionality in any user-facing way yet.
This PR just adds it to the ghostty-vt Zig module and unit tests it.
Ghostty app changes will come later.
**This also improves the readonly stream** to handle OSC color
operations for _setting_ but it doesn't emit any responses of course,
since its readonly.
This adds a new stream handler implementation that updates terminal
state in reaction to VT sequences, but doesn't perform any of the
actions that would require responses (e.g. queries).
This is exposed in two ways: first, as a standalone `ReadonlyStream` and
`ReadonlyHandler` type that contains all the implementation. Second, as
a convenience func on `Terminal` as `vtStream` and `vtHandler` which
return their respective types preconfigured to update the calling
terminal state.
This dramatically simplifies libghostty-vt usage from Zig (and will
eventually be exposed to C, too) since a Terminal on its own is ready to
go as a full VT parser and state machine without needing to build any
custom types!
There's a second big bonus here which is that our `stream_readonly.zig`
tests are true end-to-end tests for raw bytes to terminal state. This
will let us test a wider variety of situations more broadly. To start,
there are only a handful of tests implemented here.
**AI disclosure:** Amp wrote basically this whole thing, but I reviewed
it. https://ampcode.com/threads/T-3490efd2-1137-4112-96f6-4bf8a0141ff5
A whole bunch of inline annotations, some of these were tracked down
with Instruments.app, others are guesses / just seemed right because
they were trivial wrapper functions.
Regardless, these changes are ultimately supported by improved vtebench
results on my machine (Apple M3 Max).
Adds tests to ensure CSI and SGR sequences with 17 or more parameters are correctly parsed, fixing a bug where later parameters were previously dropped.
- Add more comments, and make existing ones more consistent.
- Rename commands so they consitently have a `conemu_` prefix.
- Ensure that OSC 9 desktop notifications can be sent in the maximum
number of circumstances. There are still many notifications that can't
be sent because of our support for the ConEmu OSCs but that's the
tradeoff we have chosen. We recommend that you switch to OSC 777 to
ensure desktop notifications can be sent in all circumstances.
- Make sure that the tests that exercise the ConEmu OSCs have a
consistent naming structure. That will make them easier to find
through searching as well as make it easier to filter only the ConEmu
OSC tests.
- Add more tests to make sure that desktop notifications are sent
properly.
This works around: https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/19148
This lets our `test-valgrind` command catch some issues. We'll have to
follow this pattern in more places but I want to do it incrementally so
things keep passing.
I **do not** want to blindly follow this pattern everywhere. I want to
start by focusing in only on the structs that set `undefined` as default
fields that we're also about to test in isolation with Valgrind. Its
just too much noise otherwise and not a general style I'm sure of; it's
worth it for Valgrind though.
Ghostty has had support for a while (since PR #3124) for parsing progress
reports but never did anything with them. This PR adds the core
infrastructure and an implementation for GTK.
On GTK, the progress bar will show up as a thin bar along the top of
the terminal. Under normal circumstances it will use whatever you have
set as your accent color. If the progam sending the progress report
indicates an error, it will change to a reddish color.