vim-patch:7.4.1032

Problem:    message from assert_false() does not look nice.
Solution:   Handle missing sourcing_name. Use right number of spaces. (Watiko)
            Don't use line number if it's zero.

cbfe32953a

src/nvim/eval.c

@@ -7992,10 +7992,19 @@ static void prepare_assert_error(garray_T *gap)
   char buf[NUMBUFLEN];
 
   ga_init(gap, 1, 100);
+  if (sourcing_name != NULL) {
     ga_concat(gap, sourcing_name);
-  vim_snprintf(buf, ARRAY_SIZE(buf), " line %ld", (long)sourcing_lnum);
+    if (sourcing_lnum > 0) {
+      ga_concat(gap, (char_u *)" ");
+    }
+  }
+  if (sourcing_lnum > 0) {
+    vim_snprintf(buf, ARRAY_SIZE(buf), "line %ld", (long)sourcing_lnum);
     ga_concat(gap, (char_u *)buf);
+  }
+  if (sourcing_name != NULL || sourcing_lnum > 0) {
     ga_concat(gap, (char_u *)": ");
+  }
 }
 
 // Fill "gap" with information about an assert error.
@@ -8062,7 +8071,7 @@ static void assert_bool(typval_T *argvars, bool isTrue)
       (get_tv_number_chk(&argvars[0], &error) == 0) == isTrue || error) {
     prepare_assert_error(&ga);
     fill_assert_error(&ga, &argvars[1],
-                      (char_u *)(isTrue ? "True " : "False "),
+                      (char_u *)(isTrue ? "True" : "False"),
                       NULL, &argvars[0]);
     assert_error(&ga);
     ga_clear(&ga);

src/nvim/version.c

@@ -69,6 +69,38 @@ static char *features[] = {
 
 // clang-format off
 static int included_patches[] = {
+  1032,
+  // 1031,
+  // 1030,
+  // 1029,
+  // 1028,
+  // 1027,
+  // 1026,
+  // 1025,
+  // 1024,
+  // 1023,
+  // 1022,
+  // 1021,
+  // 1020,
+  // 1019,
+  // 1018,
+  // 1017,
+  // 1016,
+  // 1015,
+  // 1014,
+  // 1013,
+  // 1012,
+  // 1011,
+  // 1010,
+  // 1009,
+  // 1008,
+  // 1007,
+  // 1006,
+  // 1005,
+  // 1004,
+  // 1003,
+  // 1002,
+  // 1001,
   // 1000,
   // 999 NA
   // 998,