mirror of
https://github.com/neovim/neovim.git
synced 2025-10-06 01:46:29 +00:00
shada: Do not forget to close ShaDa reader
Previously there was file descriptor leak, not detected by sanitizers. Now it is file descriptor leak with a small memory leak which is detected by ASAN what fails one of the tests (actually, “ShaDa support code leaves .tmp.z in-place when there is error in original ShaDa and it has .tmp.a … .tmp.x”, but error is reported at the next test because leaks are not detected until Neovim exit and Neovim exit happens when clear()/reset() is called which happens in before_each only).
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2883,12 +2883,12 @@ int shada_write_file(const char *const file, bool nomerge)
|
||||
|
||||
char *const fname = shada_filename(file);
|
||||
char *tempname = NULL;
|
||||
ShaDaWriteDef sd_writer = (ShaDaWriteDef) {
|
||||
ShaDaWriteDef sd_writer = {
|
||||
.write = &write_file,
|
||||
.close = &close_sd_writer,
|
||||
.error = NULL,
|
||||
};
|
||||
ShaDaReadDef sd_reader;
|
||||
ShaDaReadDef sd_reader = { .close = NULL };
|
||||
|
||||
if (!nomerge) {
|
||||
int error;
|
||||
@@ -2931,6 +2931,8 @@ shada_write_file_open: {}
|
||||
fname);
|
||||
xfree(fname);
|
||||
xfree(tempname);
|
||||
assert(sd_reader.close != NULL);
|
||||
sd_reader.close(&sd_reader);
|
||||
return FAIL;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
(*wp)++;
|
||||
@@ -2974,6 +2976,9 @@ shada_write_file_nomerge: {}
|
||||
if (sd_writer.cookie == NULL) {
|
||||
xfree(fname);
|
||||
xfree(tempname);
|
||||
if (sd_reader.close != NULL) {
|
||||
sd_reader.close(&sd_reader);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return FAIL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user