vim-patch:9.0.2180: POSIX function name in exarg causes issues (#28308)

Problem:  POSIX function name in exarg struct causes issues
          on OpenVMS
Solution: Rename getline member in exarg struct to ea_getline,
          remove isinf() workaround for VMS

There are compilers that do not treat well POSIX functions - like
getline - usage in the structs.

Older VMS compilers could digest this... but the newer OpenVMS compilers
( like VSI C x86-64 X7.4-843 (GEM 50XB9) ) cannot deal with these
structs. This could be limited to getline() that is defined via
getdelim() and might not affect all POSIX functions in general - but
avoiding POSIX function names usage in the structs is a "safe side"
practice without compromising the functionality or the code readability.

The previous OpenVMS X86 port used a workaround limiting the compiler
capabilities using __CRTL_VER_OVERRIDE=80400000
In order to make the OpenVMS port future proof, this pull request
proposes a possible solution.

closes: vim/vim#13704

6fdb628082

Co-authored-by: Zoltan Arpadffy <zoltan.arpadffy@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
zeertzjq
2024-04-13 06:39:30 +08:00
committed by GitHub
parent 64aa0f7d0b
commit 4f3d018d15
11 changed files with 32 additions and 31 deletions

View File

@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ list_T *heredoc_get(exarg_T *eap, char *cmd, bool script_get)
char *text_indent = NULL;
char dot[] = ".";
if (eap->getline == NULL) {
if (eap->ea_getline == NULL) {
emsg(_(e_cannot_use_heredoc_here));
return NULL;
}
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ list_T *heredoc_get(exarg_T *eap, char *cmd, bool script_get)
int ti = 0;
xfree(theline);
theline = eap->getline(NUL, eap->cookie, 0, false);
theline = eap->ea_getline(NUL, eap->cookie, 0, false);
if (theline == NULL) {
if (!script_get) {
semsg(_("E990: Missing end marker '%s'"), marker);