mirror of
https://github.com/neovim/neovim.git
synced 2025-09-29 06:28:35 +00:00
vim-patch:9.0.2110: [security]: overflow in ex address parsing
Problem: [security]: overflow in ex address parsing
Solution: Verify that lnum is positive, before substracting from
LONG_MAX
[security]: overflow in ex address parsing
When parsing relative ex addresses one may unintentionally cause an
overflow (because LONG_MAX - lnum will overflow for negative addresses).
So verify that lnum is actually positive before doing the overflow
check.
060623e4a3
Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -3552,7 +3552,7 @@ static linenr_T get_address(exarg_T *eap, char **ptr, cmd_addr_T addr_type, int
|
||||
if (i == '-') {
|
||||
lnum -= n;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (n >= INT32_MAX - lnum) {
|
||||
if (lnum >= 0 && n >= INT32_MAX - lnum) {
|
||||
*errormsg = _(e_line_number_out_of_range);
|
||||
goto error;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@@ -745,5 +745,9 @@ func Test_write_after_rename()
|
||||
bwipe!
|
||||
endfunc
|
||||
|
||||
" catch address lines overflow
|
||||
func Test_ex_address_range_overflow()
|
||||
call assert_fails(':--+foobar', 'E492:')
|
||||
endfunc
|
||||
|
||||
" vim: shiftwidth=2 sts=2 expandtab
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user