vim-patch:9.0.2108: [security]: overflow with count for :s command

Problem:  [security]: overflow with count for :s command
Solution: Abort the :s command if the count is too large

If the count after the :s command is larger than what fits into a
(signed) long variable, abort with e_value_too_large.

Adds a test with INT_MAX as count and verify it correctly fails.

It seems the return value on Windows using mingw compiler wraps around,
so the initial test using :s/./b/9999999999999999999999999990 doesn't
fail there, since the count is wrapping around several times and finally
is no longer larger than 2147483647. So let's just use 2147483647 in the
test, which hopefully will always cause a failure

ac63787734

Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
This commit is contained in:
zeertzjq
2023-11-17 06:41:03 +08:00
parent 354b57b01f
commit a4c111ae69
6 changed files with 15 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@@ -1026,11 +1026,13 @@ EXTERN const char e_highlight_group_name_too_long[] INIT(= N_("E1249: Highlight
EXTERN const char e_invalid_line_number_nr[] INIT(= N_("E966: Invalid line number: %ld"));
EXTERN char e_stray_closing_curly_str[]
EXTERN const char e_stray_closing_curly_str[]
INIT(= N_("E1278: Stray '}' without a matching '{': %s"));
EXTERN char e_missing_close_curly_str[]
EXTERN const char e_missing_close_curly_str[]
INIT(= N_("E1279: Missing '}': %s"));
EXTERN const char e_val_too_large[] INIT(= N_("E1510: Value too large: %s"));
EXTERN const char e_undobang_cannot_redo_or_move_branch[]
INIT(= N_("E5767: Cannot use :undo! to redo or move to a different undo branch"));