mirror of
https://github.com/neovim/neovim.git
synced 2025-09-29 14:38:32 +00:00
vim-patch:9.0.0751: 'scrolloff' does not work well with 'smoothscroll'
Problem: 'scrolloff' does not work well with 'smoothscroll'.
Solution: Make positioning the cursor a bit better. Rename functions.
c9121f798f
Co-authored-by: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2432,7 +2432,7 @@ bool find_decl(char *ptr, size_t len, bool locally, bool thisblock, int flags_ar
|
||||
/// @return true if able to move cursor, false otherwise.
|
||||
static bool nv_screengo(oparg_T *oap, int dir, long dist)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int linelen = linetabsize(get_cursor_line_ptr());
|
||||
int linelen = linetabsize_str(get_cursor_line_ptr());
|
||||
bool retval = true;
|
||||
bool atend = false;
|
||||
int col_off1; // margin offset for first screen line
|
||||
@@ -2494,7 +2494,7 @@ static bool nv_screengo(oparg_T *oap, int dir, long dist)
|
||||
retval = false;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
linelen = linetabsize(get_cursor_line_ptr());
|
||||
linelen = linetabsize_str(get_cursor_line_ptr());
|
||||
if (linelen > width1) {
|
||||
int w = (((linelen - width1 - 1) / width2) + 1) * width2;
|
||||
assert(curwin->w_curswant <= INT_MAX - w);
|
||||
@@ -2525,7 +2525,7 @@ static bool nv_screengo(oparg_T *oap, int dir, long dist)
|
||||
if (curwin->w_curswant >= width1) {
|
||||
curwin->w_curswant -= width2;
|
||||
}
|
||||
linelen = linetabsize(get_cursor_line_ptr());
|
||||
linelen = linetabsize_str(get_cursor_line_ptr());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -5497,7 +5497,7 @@ static void nv_g_cmd(cmdarg_T *cap)
|
||||
case 'M':
|
||||
oap->motion_type = kMTCharWise;
|
||||
oap->inclusive = false;
|
||||
i = linetabsize(get_cursor_line_ptr());
|
||||
i = linetabsize_str(get_cursor_line_ptr());
|
||||
if (cap->count0 > 0 && cap->count0 <= 100) {
|
||||
coladvance((colnr_T)(i * cap->count0 / 100));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user