refactor(memline): distinguish mutating uses of ml_get_buf()

ml_get_buf() takes a third parameters to indicate whether the
caller wants to mutate the memline data in place. However
the vast majority of the call sites is using this function
just to specify a buffer but without any mutation. This makes
it harder to grep for the places which actually perform mutation.

Solution: Remove the bool param from ml_get_buf(). it now works
like ml_get() except for a non-current buffer. Add a new
ml_get_buf_mut() function for the mutating use-case, which can
be grepped along with the other ml_replace() etc functions which
can modify the memline.
This commit is contained in:
bfredl
2023-08-24 15:14:23 +02:00
parent daf7abbc42
commit cefd774fac
43 changed files with 134 additions and 123 deletions

View File

@@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ Integer nvim_buf_set_extmark(Buffer buffer, Integer ns_id, Integer line, Integer
});
line = buf->b_ml.ml_line_count;
} else if (line < buf->b_ml.ml_line_count) {
len = opts->ephemeral ? MAXCOL : strlen(ml_get_buf(buf, (linenr_T)line + 1, false));
len = opts->ephemeral ? MAXCOL : strlen(ml_get_buf(buf, (linenr_T)line + 1));
}
if (col == -1) {
@@ -801,7 +801,7 @@ Integer nvim_buf_set_extmark(Buffer buffer, Integer ns_id, Integer line, Integer
if (col2 >= 0) {
if (line2 >= 0 && line2 < buf->b_ml.ml_line_count) {
len = opts->ephemeral ? MAXCOL : strlen(ml_get_buf(buf, (linenr_T)line2 + 1, false));
len = opts->ephemeral ? MAXCOL : strlen(ml_get_buf(buf, (linenr_T)line2 + 1));
} else if (line2 == buf->b_ml.ml_line_count) {
// We are trying to add an extmark past final newline
len = 0;