refactor(memline): distinguish mutating uses of ml_get_buf()

ml_get_buf() takes a third parameters to indicate whether the
caller wants to mutate the memline data in place. However
the vast majority of the call sites is using this function
just to specify a buffer but without any mutation. This makes
it harder to grep for the places which actually perform mutation.

Solution: Remove the bool param from ml_get_buf(). it now works
like ml_get() except for a non-current buffer. Add a new
ml_get_buf_mut() function for the mutating use-case, which can
be grepped along with the other ml_replace() etc functions which
can modify the memline.
This commit is contained in:
bfredl
2023-08-24 15:14:23 +02:00
parent daf7abbc42
commit cefd774fac
43 changed files with 134 additions and 123 deletions

View File

@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ static void next_search_hl(win_T *win, match_T *search_hl, match_T *shl, linenr_
char *ml;
matchcol = shl->rm.startpos[0].col;
ml = ml_get_buf(shl->buf, lnum, false) + matchcol;
ml = ml_get_buf(shl->buf, lnum) + matchcol;
if (*ml == NUL) {
matchcol++;
shl->lnum = 0;
@@ -630,7 +630,7 @@ bool prepare_search_hl_line(win_T *wp, linenr_T lnum, colnr_T mincol, char **lin
// Need to get the line again, a multi-line regexp may have made it
// invalid.
*line = ml_get_buf(wp->w_buffer, lnum, false);
*line = ml_get_buf(wp->w_buffer, lnum);
if (shl->lnum != 0 && shl->lnum <= lnum) {
if (shl->lnum == lnum) {
@@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ int update_search_hl(win_T *wp, linenr_T lnum, colnr_T col, char **line, match_T
// Need to get the line again, a multi-line regexp
// may have made it invalid.
*line = ml_get_buf(wp->w_buffer, lnum, false);
*line = ml_get_buf(wp->w_buffer, lnum);
if (shl->lnum == lnum) {
shl->startcol = shl->rm.startpos[0].col;