vim-patch:9.1.0141: Put in Visual mode wrong if it replaces fold marker (#27661)

Problem:  Put in Visual mode wrong if it replaces fold marker.
Solution: Temporarily disable folding during put in Visual mode.
          (zeertzjq)

fixes: vim/vim#14097
closes: vim/vim#14100

4e141c66b9
This commit is contained in:
zeertzjq
2024-02-29 06:48:29 +08:00
committed by GitHub
parent f912030d4e
commit e592657df8
2 changed files with 38 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@@ -6446,6 +6446,7 @@ static void nv_put_opt(cmdarg_T *cap, bool fix_indent)
bool was_visual = false;
int dir;
int flags = 0;
const int save_fen = curwin->w_p_fen;
if (cap->oap->op_type != OP_NOP) {
// "dp" is ":diffput"
@@ -6496,6 +6497,10 @@ static void nv_put_opt(cmdarg_T *cap, bool fix_indent)
savereg = copy_register(regname);
}
// Temporarily disable folding, as deleting a fold marker may cause
// the cursor to be included in a fold.
curwin->w_p_fen = false;
// To place the cursor correctly after a blockwise put, and to leave the
// text in the correct position when putting over a selection with
// 'virtualedit' and past the end of the line, we use the 'c' operator in
@@ -6546,9 +6551,12 @@ static void nv_put_opt(cmdarg_T *cap, bool fix_indent)
xfree(savereg);
}
// What to reselect with "gv"? Selecting the just put text seems to
// be the most useful, since the original text was removed.
if (was_visual) {
if (save_fen) {
curwin->w_p_fen = true;
}
// What to reselect with "gv"? Selecting the just put text seems to
// be the most useful, since the original text was removed.
curbuf->b_visual.vi_start = curbuf->b_op_start;
curbuf->b_visual.vi_end = curbuf->b_op_end;
// need to adjust cursor position