vim-patch:7.4.1783

Problem:    The old regexp engine doesn't handle character classes correctly.
            (Manuel Ortega)
Solution:   Use regmbc() instead of regc().  Add a test.

af98a49dd0
This commit is contained in:
Michael Ennen
2016-12-21 16:08:51 -07:00
parent 415495273c
commit e8ccaa7a52
3 changed files with 91 additions and 23 deletions

View File

@@ -2311,14 +2311,14 @@ collection:
case CLASS_ALNUM:
for (cu = 1; cu < 128; cu++) {
if (isalnum(cu)) {
regc(cu);
regmbc(cu);
}
}
break;
case CLASS_ALPHA:
for (cu = 1; cu < 128; cu++) {
if (isalpha(cu)) {
regc(cu);
regmbc(cu);
}
}
break;
@@ -2327,36 +2327,44 @@ collection:
regc('\t');
break;
case CLASS_CNTRL:
for (cu = 1; cu <= 255; cu++)
if (iscntrl(cu))
regc(cu);
for (cu = 1; cu <= 255; cu++) {
if (iscntrl(cu)) {
regmbc(cu);
}
}
break;
case CLASS_DIGIT:
for (cu = 1; cu <= 255; cu++)
if (ascii_isdigit(cu))
regc(cu);
for (cu = 1; cu <= 255; cu++) {
if (ascii_isdigit(cu)) {
regmbc(cu);
}
}
break;
case CLASS_GRAPH:
for (cu = 1; cu <= 255; cu++)
if (isgraph(cu))
regc(cu);
for (cu = 1; cu <= 255; cu++) {
if (isgraph(cu)) {
regmbc(cu);
}
}
break;
case CLASS_LOWER:
for (cu = 1; cu <= 255; cu++) {
if (vim_islower(cu) && cu != 170 && cu != 186) {
regc(cu);
regmbc(cu);
}
}
break;
case CLASS_PRINT:
for (cu = 1; cu <= 255; cu++)
if (vim_isprintc(cu))
regc(cu);
for (cu = 1; cu <= 255; cu++) {
if (vim_isprintc(cu)) {
regmbc(cu);
}
}
break;
case CLASS_PUNCT:
for (cu = 1; cu < 128; cu++) {
if (ispunct(cu)) {
regc(cu);
regmbc(cu);
}
}
break;
@@ -2366,14 +2374,18 @@ collection:
regc(' ');
break;
case CLASS_UPPER:
for (cu = 1; cu <= 255; cu++)
if (vim_isupper(cu))
regc(cu);
for (cu = 1; cu <= 255; cu++) {
if (vim_isupper(cu)) {
regmbc(cu);
}
}
break;
case CLASS_XDIGIT:
for (cu = 1; cu <= 255; cu++)
if (ascii_isxdigit(cu))
regc(cu);
for (cu = 1; cu <= 255; cu++) {
if (ascii_isxdigit(cu)) {
regmbc(cu);
}
}
break;
case CLASS_TAB:
regc('\t');