mirrors/neovim
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/neovim/neovim.git synced 2025-09-27 13:38:34 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

vim-patch:9.0.0861: solution for "!!sort" in closed fold is not optimal (#21027)

Browse Source 
Problem:    Solution for "!!sort" in closed fold is not optimal.
Solution:   Use a different range instead of the subtle difference in handling
            a range with an offset. (issue vim/vim#11487)

9954dc39ea

Co-authored-by: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org>
This commit is contained in:
zeertzjq
2022-11-12 07:43:36 +08:00
committed by GitHub
parent 0d7cc5ee85
commit eee9560516
4 changed files with 103 additions and 19 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

13
src/nvim/ops.c
View File

@@ -5555,13 +5555,22 @@ static void op_colon(oparg_T *oap)
} else {
stuffnumReadbuff((long)oap->start.lnum);
}
if (oap->end.lnum != oap->start.lnum) {
// When using !! on a closed fold the range ".!" works best to operate
// on, it will be made the whole closed fold later.
linenr_T endOfStartFold = oap->start.lnum;
(void)hasFolding(oap->start.lnum, NULL, &endOfStartFold);
if (oap->end.lnum != oap->start.lnum && oap->end.lnum != endOfStartFold) {
// Make it a range with the end line.
stuffcharReadbuff(',');
if (oap->end.lnum == curwin->w_cursor.lnum) {
stuffcharReadbuff('.');
} else if (oap->end.lnum == curbuf->b_ml.ml_line_count) {
stuffcharReadbuff('$');
} else if (oap->start.lnum == curwin->w_cursor.lnum) {
} else if (oap->start.lnum == curwin->w_cursor.lnum
// do not use ".+number" for a closed fold, it would count
// folded lines twice
&& !hasFolding(oap->end.lnum, NULL, NULL)) {
stuffReadbuff(".+");
stuffnumReadbuff(oap->line_count - 1);
} else {