Problem: a pattern that involves a backref on a different line does not
match when 'ignorecase' is set (QiWei, after v9.1.0645)
Solution: Use MB_STRNICMP when ignorecase is set, fix tests to close
swapfiles
related: vim/vim#14756fixes: vim/vim#17470closes: vim/vim#18104bf82e58a70
Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
Problem: regex: wrong match when searching multi-byte char
case-insensitive (diffsetter)
Solution: Apply proper case-folding for characters and search-string
This patch does the following 4 things:
1) When the regexp engine compares two utf-8 codepoints case
insensitive it may match an adjacent character, because it assumes
it can step over as many bytes as the pattern contains.
This however is not necessarily true because of case-folding, a
multi-byte UTF-8 character can be considered equal to some
single-byte value.
Let's consider the pattern 'ſ' and the string 's'. When comparing and
ignoring case, the single character 's' matches, and since it matches
Vim will try to step over the match (by the amount of bytes of the
pattern), assuming that since it matches, the length of both strings is
the same.
However in that case, it should only step over the single byte value
's' by 1 byte and try to start matching after it again. So for the
backtracking engine we need to ensure:
* we try to match the correct length for the pattern and the text
* in case of a match, we step over it correctly
There is one tricky thing for the backtracing engine. We also need to
calculate correctly the number of bytes to compare the 2 different
utf-8 strings s1 and s2. So we will count the number of characters in
s1 that the byte len specified. Then we count the number of bytes to
step over the same number of characters in string s2 and then we can
correctly compare the 2 utf-8 strings.
2) A similar thing can happen for the NFA engine, when skipping to the
next character to test for a match. We are skipping over the regstart
pointer, however we do not consider the case that because of
case-folding we may need to adjust the number of bytes to skip over.
So this needs to be adjusted in find_match_text() as well.
3) A related issue turned out, when prog->match_text is actually empty.
In that case we should try to find the next match and skip this
condition.
4) When comparing characters using collections, we must also apply case
folding to each character in the collection and not just to the
current character from the search string. This doesn't apply to the
NFA engine, because internally it converts collections to branches
[abc] -> a\|b\|c
fixes: vim/vim#14294closes: vim/vim#1475622e8e12d9f
N/A patches:
vim-patch:9.0.1771: regex: combining chars in collections not handled
vim-patch:9.0.1777: patch 9.0.1771 causes problems
Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
Problem: Illegal memory access when pattern starts with illegal byte.
Solution: Do not match a character with an illegal byte.
f50940531d
Co-authored-by: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org>
Problem: No test for highlight behavior with 'ambiwidth'.
Solution: Add a screendump test for 'ambiwidth' with 'cursorline'.
(zeertzjq)
closes: vim/vim#14554a59e031aa0
Problem: Patch 9.1.0296 causes too many issues
(Tony Mechelynck, chdiza, CI)
Solution: Back out the change for now
Revert "patch 9.1.0296: regexp: engines do not handle case-folding well"
This reverts commit 7a27c108e0509f3255ebdcb6558e896c223e4d23 it causes
issues with syntax highlighting and breaks the FreeBSD and MacOS CI. It
needs more work.
fixes: vim/vim#14487c97f4d61cd
Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
Problem: Regex engines do not handle case-folding well
Solution: Correctly calculate byte length of characters to skip
When the regexp engine compares two utf-8 codepoints case insensitively
it may match an adjacent character, because it assumes it can step over
as many bytes as the pattern contains.
This however is not necessarily true because of case-folding, a
multi-byte UTF-8 character can be considered equal to some single-byte
value.
Let's consider the pattern 'ſ' and the string 's'. When comparing and
ignoring case, the single character 's' matches, and since it matches
Vim will try to step over the match (by the amount of bytes of the
pattern), assuming that since it matches, the length of both strings is
the same.
However in that case, it should only step over the single byte
value 's' so by 1 byte and try to start matching after it again. So for the
backtracking engine we need to ensure:
- we try to match the correct length for the pattern and the text
- in case of a match, we step over it correctly
The same thing can happen for the NFA engine, when skipping to the next
character to test for a match. We are skipping over the regstart
pointer, however we do not consider the case that because of
case-folding we may need to adjust the number of bytes to skip over. So
this needs to be adjusted in find_match_text() as well.
A related issue turned out, when prog->match_text is actually empty. In
that case we should try to find the next match and skip this condition.
fixes: vim/vim#14294closes: vim/vim#144337a27c108e0
Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
Problem: regexp cannot match combining chars in collection
Solution: Check for combining characters in regex collections for the
NFA and BT Regex Engine
Also, while at it, make debug mode work again.
fixesvim/vim#10286closes: vim/vim#12871d2cc51f9a1
Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
