Commit Graph

17 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
jdrouhard
44d5593afd refactor(lsp): unify LspNotify, decor provider for capabilities #40691
Problem: Every LSP capability that sends a request on a document change
to update its state was using its own buffer-local autocmd to do so.
That means there is a separate autocmd per buffer per active
capability/feature, and the actual code inside the autocmd callback was
virtually identical. The same problem occurred for capabilities that had
components to draw on the screen that had their own decoration providers.

Solution: Introduce a central `LspNotify` autocmd and decoration
provider in the capability module itself. New base class methods
`on_close` and `on_change` that take a client_id have been provided, for
`didClose` and `didOpen`/`didChange` notifications respectively. New
base class method `on_win` that takes topline and botline has been
provided to add extmarks or perform other work when lines of a buffer
are being drawn.

The autocmd callback loops through each active capability instance for
the buffer and calls a corresponding method with the triggering
client_id if it is currently attached to the buffer that triggered the
autocmd. The decoration provider just calls on_win for all active
capabilities on the buffer.

This slightly tweaks folding range to make use of these new client-id
specific callbacks.
2026-07-15 07:07:17 -04:00
jdrouhard
1f18ea1cf7 feat(lsp): convert inlay_hint to capability framework #40569
Problem:
Inlay hints used separate global and per-buffer bufstates tables and
bespoke global autocmds for managing the inlay hint state across buffers
and clients, duplicating the lifecycle logic already provided by the
Capability framework. This caused inconsistencies in how client state
was handled and inlay hint state lifecycle was managed compared to other
LSP features.

Solution:
Replace the ad-hoc bufstate tracking and global autocmds in
vim.lsp.inlay_hint with a proper InlayHint subclass of Capability.

This also refactors the way inlay hint state is managed and fixes bugs I
found while doing this:

1. For each line with inlay hints, the list of the hints along with
   whether they have been applied is stored in a current result on the
   client state. This allows the on_win decorator to clear all inlay
   hints for an old document version once, and then re-add the new
   version's hints line-by-line as they are drawn to the screen,
   modeling the semantic tokens module.
2. It fixes problems with mixing results from multiple clients attached
   to the buffer by fully moving each client's state to its own table.
   Previously, only the most recent document version used to populate a
   line's inlay hints was stored, but there was no distinction for which
   client the hints may have come from. (Fixes #36318)
3. It fixes the workspace/inlayHint/refresh server->client notification
   behavior. Previously it would only re-request inlay hints for buffers
   currently displayed in a window but would not invalidate them in
   non-displayed buffers (or provide any mechanism for those buffers to
   re-request at a later time). Model semantic token module here again
   by invalidating all buffers, and adding a BufWinEnter autocmd to
   refresh hints.
4. Add a mechanism to cancel in-flight requests if a new request for a
   newer document version is made before the last one returned
5. Handle stale results by simply dropping them.
2026-07-05 12:47:30 -04:00
jdrouhard
c98c93fcf8 refactor(lsp): convert diagnostics to capability framework #40433
Problem:
Diagnostic tracking used a separate bufstates table and manual
LspDetach/LspNotify autocmd management via _enable()/_refresh(),
duplicating the lifecycle logic already provided by the Capability
framework. This caused inconsistencies in how client attach/detach and
buffer teardown were handled compared to other LSP features.

Solution:
Replace the ad-hoc bufstate tracking and _enable/_refresh pattern in
vim.lsp.diagnostic with a proper Diagnostics subclass of Capability.
This cleans up a few random places in the main lsp module and client
module that were poking the diagnostics. It also fixes some pre-existing
bugs and inconsistencies that were discovered:

- Refresh diagnostics immediately on attach instead of lazily by the
  first didOpen/didChange notification
- Fix Capability.active lookup in M.enable() to key by it_bufnr instead
  of the filter bufnr
- Set lsp defaults before calling the _text_document_did_open_handler in
  Client:on_attach() so defaults are there before any lsp notification
  occurs
- Log (and return early) on any error from a diagnostic request result
  instead of only returning early for server cancelled errors
2026-06-26 14:41:26 -04:00
Gregory Anders
ed267268b8 fix(lsp): allow specifying bufnr + client_id filter when enabling capabilities #37690
Today there is a constraint that these arguments to the enable filter be
mutually exclusive, but I do not know why such a constraint exists (it
is perfectly reasonable to want to enable a capabilility for just one
buffer and just one client).
2026-06-17 07:26:18 -04:00
Olivia Kinnear
fcd1d97265 feat(lua)!: vim.isnil, vim.nonnil, deprecate vim.F #39495 2026-05-06 08:15:00 -04:00
Maria Solano
4430c9a424 feat(lsp): migrate document_color to capability framework (#38344)
* feat(lsp): migrate `document_color` to capability framework

* feat(lsp): use `vim.Range` in `document_color` module
2026-03-18 17:18:48 -07:00
Yi Ming
fe23168e2b feat(lsp)!: reimplement textDocument/codeLens as decoration provider 2026-02-03 22:25:18 +08:00
Tristan Knight
9e9cdcaa18 refactor(lsp): unify capability checks and registration #36781
Problem:
Our LSP type system didnt have a concept of RegistrationMethods, this is where the method to dynamically register for a capability is sent to a different method endpoint then is used to call it. Eg `textDocument/semanticTokens` rather than the specific full/range/delta methods

Solution:
Extended generator to create `vim.lsp.protocol.Methods.Registration` with these registration methods. Also extend `_request_name_to_client_capability` to cover these methods. Adjust typing to suit
2025-12-06 18:31:11 -05:00
Maria Solano
70ea589d79 fix(lsp): deprecate vim.lsp.get_buffers_by_client_id (#36449) 2025-11-10 06:58:56 -08:00
Yi Ming
0e70aa0e86 feat(lsp): support textDocument/inlineCompletion 2025-08-25 09:48:27 +08:00
Yi Ming
f40162ba19 refactor(lsp): use vim.lsp._capability.enable internally 2025-08-18 19:41:55 +08:00
Yi Ming
2ace4089f8 refactor(lsp): no longer rely on LspDetach for detaching capabilities 2025-08-18 19:41:55 +08:00
Yi Ming
b3fbc8d6fa refactor(lsp): move util.enable to capability.enable 2025-08-18 19:41:53 +08:00
Yi Ming
a37e101dc7 refactor(lsp): change capability name to snake case 2025-08-17 12:37:34 +08:00
Yi Ming
7c3e579a90 refactor(lsp): register all derived Capability prototypes 2025-08-17 12:37:34 +08:00
Yi Ming
81d8198bda refactor(lsp): define Capability.on_attach 2025-08-17 12:37:34 +08:00
Yi Ming
8d5452c46d refactor(lsp): stateful data abstraction, vim.lsp.Capability #34639
Problem:
Closes #31453

Solution:
Introduce `vim.lsp.Capability`, which may serve as the base class for
all LSP features that require caching data. it
- was created if there is at least one client that supports the specific method;
- was destroyed if all clients that support the method were detached.

- Apply the refactor for `folding_range.lua` and `semantic_tokens.lua`.
- Show active features in :checkhealth.

Future:
I found that these features that are expected to be refactored by
`vim.lsp.Capability` have one characteristic in common: they all send
LSP requests once the document is modified. The following code is
different, but they are all for this purpose.

- semantic tokens:
fb8dba413f/runtime/lua/vim/lsp/semantic_tokens.lua (L192-L198)
- inlay hints, folding ranges, document color
fb8dba413f/runtime/lua/vim/lsp/inlay_hint.lua (L250-L266)

I think I can sum up this characteristic as the need to keep certain
data synchronized with the latest version computed by the server.
I believe we can handle this at the `vim.lsp.Capability` level, and
I think it will be very useful.

Therefore, my next step is to implement LSP request sending and data
synchronization on `vim.lsp.Capability`, rather than limiting it to the
current create/destroy data approach.
2025-07-07 03:51:30 +00:00