This ameliorates use-cases like:
:!cat foo.txt
:make
where the user is interested in the last few lines of output.
Try these shell-based ex-commands before/after this commit:
:grep -r '' *
:make
:!yes
:!grep -r '' *
:!git grep ''
:!cat foo
:!echo foo
:!while true; do date; done
:!for i in `seq 1 20000`; do echo XXXXXXXXXX $i; done
In all cases the last few lines of the command should always be shown,
regardless of where throttling was triggered.
Periodically skip :! spam. This is a "cheat" that works for all UIs and greatly
improves responsiveness when :! spams MB or GB of output:
:!yes
:!while true; do date; done
:!git grep ''
:grep -r '' *
After ~10KB of data is seen from a single :! invocation, output will be skipped
for ~1s and three dots "..." will pulse in the bottom-left. Thereafter the
behavior alternates at every:
* 10KB received
* ~1s throttled
This also avoids out-of-memory which could happen with large :! outputs.
Note: This commit does not change the behavior of execute(':!foo').
execute(':!foo') returns the string ':!foo^M', it captures *only* Vim
messages, *not* shell command output. Vim behaves the same way.
Use system('foo') for capturing shell command output.
Closes#1234
Helped-by: oni-link <knil.ino@gmail.com>
Closes#1234
multiqueue:
- Implement multiqueue_size()
- Rename MultiQueueItem.parent to MultiQueueItem.parent_item, to avoid confusion
with MultiQueue.parent.
https://github.com/mpeterv/luacheck/pull/81#issuecomment-261099606
> If you really want to use bleeding-edge version you should get the
> rockspec from master branch, not a fixed commit ...
> The correct way to install from a specific commit is cloning that
> commit and running "luarocks make" from project directory. The reason
> is that running "install" or "build" on an scm rockspec fetches
> sources from master but uses build description from the rockspec
> itself, which may be outdated.
Problem: Using freed memory after setqflist() and ":caddbuffer". (Dominique)
Solution: Set qf_ptr when adding the first item to the quickfix list.
8b20179c65
In order to not conflict with new error codes that Vim adds, all Neovim
error codes should be above 5000. The three existing sub-5000 error
codes (E926, E951, and E952) are now E50003, E5004, and E5005
respectively.
E953 was removed in 6167ce6df2, so just
remove it from the help.
Problem: Crash when an autocommand changes a quickfix list. (Dominique)
Solution: Check wether an entry is still valid. (Yegappan Lakshmanan,
Hirohito Higashi)
ffec3c5349
Problem: Order of matches for 'omnifunc' is messed up. (Danny Su)
Solution: Do not set compl_curr_match when called from complete_check().
(closesvim/vim#1168)
472e85970e
* health.vim: Include v:throwpoint in error message
* health/provider.vim: Check for ruby executable
* health/provider.vim: Combine subprocess stdout and stderr
* test: Updated CheckHealth test
Problem: Vertical movement after CTRL-A ends up in the wrong column.
(Urtica Dioica)
Solution: Set curswant when appropriate. (Hirohito Higashi)
8e08125d3a
- Use a standard scratch buffer instead of a new 'buftype', functions
like curbufIsChanged() already have special handling for scratch bufs.
- Cleanup some stuff from the previous merge.
- Add support for :smagic, :snomagic. Closes#5578
Add tests for undotree().
Helped-by: Björn Linse <bjorn.linse@gmail.com>
When "curhead" points to a valid head, the value of "newhead" is
meaningless (and really should be set to null). The undo state for
a buffer is _logically_ the enum:
enum UndoState {
CurrentHead(head),
NewHead(head),
EmptyTree
}
nvim _represents_ this as: whenever `curbuf->b_u_curhead` is nonnull it
should be used as the current head, and `curbuf->b_u_newhead` is
ignored. If the there is a current head, then this will be redoed on the
next redo, and its parent will be undone on next undo. Only if
`b_u_curhead` is NULL, `b_u_newhead` will be used as the head to undo
(and it is not possible to redo). Also both can be NULL, to indicate an
empty undotree. (To be fair, this only strictly true when calling undo.c
from the outside, in some places _within_ a function in undo.c both
values might be meaningful)
Apparently `undotree()` breaks this non-abstraction, this _cosmetic_
issue can easily be fixed by `ex_substitute` also saving and restoring
`b_u_newhead`, but is doesn't reflect any error really how
`u_undo_and_forget` manipulates the _actual_ state of the undo tree.
