Problem:
Autocmds in inline_completion Completor are not scoped to specific
buffers. When multiple buffers have inline completion enabled, events
(InsertEnter, CursorMovedI, TextChangedP, InsertLeave) in any buffer
trigger callbacks for all Completor instances, causing incorrect
behavior across buffers.
Solution:
Add `buffer = bufnr` parameter to nvim_create_autocmd() calls to make
them buffer-local. Each Completor instance now only responds to events
in its own buffer.
Problem:
If there are 2 language servers with different trigger chars (`-` and
`>`), and a keymap inputs both simultaneously (`->`), then `>` doesn't
trigger. We get completion items from server1 only.
This happens because the `completion_timer` for the `-` trigger is still
pending.
Solution:
If the next character arrived enough quickly (< 25 ms), replace the
existing deferred autotrigger with a new one that matches this later
character.
This fixes a regression from #33796.
I tried for several hours and cannot write a working test for this, but
this does fix the following warning in tests run with ASAN or TSAN:
-------- Running tests from test/functional/plugin/lsp_spec.lua
RUN T4667 LSP server_name specified start_client(), stop_client(): 114.00 ms OK
RUN T4668 LSP server_name specified stop_client() also works on client objects: 97.00 ms OK
RUN T4669 LSP server_name specified does not reuse an already-stopping client #33616: 31.00 ms OK
nvim took 2022 milliseconds to exit after last test
This indicates a likely problem with the test even if it passed!
Problem: The registerCapability handler re-enables document_color,
making it impossible to disable it in LspAttach.
Solution: Enable it once on initialization and avoid re-enabling
on registerCapability.
This also fixes the following warning in tests with ASAN or TSAN:
-------- Running tests from test/functional/plugin/lsp/inline_completion_spec.lua
RUN T4604 vim.lsp.inline_completion enable() requests or abort when entered/left insert mode: 225.00 ms OK
RUN T4605 vim.lsp.inline_completion get() applies the current candidate: 212.00 ms OK
nvim took 2013 milliseconds to exit after last test
This indicates a likely problem with the test even if it passed!
RUN T4606 vim.lsp.inline_completion get() accepts on_accept callback: 212.00 ms OK
RUN T4607 vim.lsp.inline_completion select() selects the next candidate: 220.00 ms OK
-------- 4 tests from test/functional/plugin/lsp/inline_completion_spec.lua (3437.00 ms total)
-------- Running tests from test/functional/plugin/lsp/linked_editing_range_spec.lua
nvim took 2011 milliseconds to exit after last test
This indicates a likely problem with the test even if it passed!
- Problem: It's not clear for new plugin developers that `:help` uses
a help-tags file for searching the docs, generated by `:helptags`.
- Solution: Hint to the |:helptags| docs for regenerating the tags
file for their freshly written documentation.
Co-authored-by: Yochem van Rosmalen <git@yochem.nl>
Problem:
Hover response of MarkedString[] where the first element contains a
language identifier treated as empty.
Solution:
Fix empty check to handle case of MarkedString[] where the first element
is a pair of a language and value.
- Add delimiter between function signature and documentation, matching hover formatting
- Show title only if there are multiple clients or multiple signatures
- Avoid duplicating the title inside the window if it's already shown in the border
Problem: make_floating_popup_options only shows when opts.border is explicitly set, ignoring global winborder setting
Solution: check both opts.border and vim.o.winborder when determining whether to show title
Problem:
Previously, 'null' value in LSP responses were decoded as 'nil'.
This caused ambiguity for fields typed as '? | null' and led to
loss of explicit 'null' values, particularly in 'data' parameters.
Solution:
Decode all JSON 'null' values as 'vim.NIL' and adjust handling
where needed. This better aligns with the LSP specification,
where 'null' and absent fields are distinct, and 'null' should
not be used to represent missing values.
This also enables proper validation of response messages to
ensure that exactly one of 'result' or 'error' is present, as
required by the JSON-RPC specification.
