Files
neovim/test/functional/lua
Luis Calle 416f3482e7 fix(vim.range): empty ranges semantics vs regular ranges #39474
Problem:
- Empty ranges have different `<`, `<=`, `has` and `intersect` semantics compared to regular ranges.
- `to_inclusive_pos` assumes that the end position of a range is exclusive, which is not true for empty ranges

Solution:
Special case empty ranges in these operations.
2026-05-08 05:17:00 -04:00
..
2024-04-23 18:17:04 +02:00
2025-01-09 09:26:45 -08:00
2024-04-23 18:17:04 +02:00
2026-03-29 13:36:56 +02:00