Files
neovim/runtime
Justin M. Keyes 9b028bd64f refactor(vim.iter)!: rename xxback() => rxx() #28503
Problem:
vim.iter has both `rfind()` and various `*back()` methods, which work
in "reverse" or "backwards" order. It's inconsistent to have both kinds
of names, and "back" is fairly uncommon (rust) compared to python
(rfind, rstrip, rsplit, …).

Solution:
- Remove `nthback()` and let `nth()` take a negative index.
  - Because `rnth()` looks pretty obscure, and because it's intuitive
    for a function named `nth()` to take negative indexes.
- Rename `xxback()` methods to `rxx()`.
  - This informally groups the "list-iterator" functions under a common
    `r` prefix, which helps discoverability.
- Rename `peekback()` to `pop()`, in duality with the existing `peek`.
2024-04-26 08:43:29 -07:00
..
2024-04-04 10:29:58 +02:00
2024-04-16 09:33:51 +08:00
2024-04-25 23:46:46 +02:00
2023-11-05 21:56:56 +01:00
2024-02-16 08:57:45 +01:00
2024-03-24 10:32:07 +01:00
2024-04-25 08:23:39 +02:00
2022-08-20 10:04:55 +02:00
2024-03-28 09:32:32 +08:00
2024-02-01 12:06:55 +01:00
2023-08-13 13:25:10 +01:00
2023-08-13 13:25:10 +01:00
2023-08-13 13:25:10 +01:00
2023-08-13 13:25:10 +01:00
2023-08-13 13:25:10 +01:00
2023-08-13 13:25:10 +01:00
2023-08-24 11:33:06 +09:00
2024-03-14 15:04:31 +08:00