Files
neovim/runtime/doc
zeertzjq a04c73cc17 fix(input): discard following keys when discarding <Cmd>/K_LUA (#36498)
Technically the current behavior does match documentation. However, the
keys following <Cmd>/K_LUA aren't normally received by vim.on_key()
callbacks either, so it does makes sense to discard them along with the
preceding key.

One may also argue that vim.on_key() callbacks should instead receive
the following keys together with the <Cmd>/K_LUA, but doing that may
cause some performance problems, and even in that case the keys should
still be discarded together.
2025-11-20 12:33:02 +08:00
..
2025-09-16 11:41:36 +08:00
2025-11-15 22:47:38 -05:00
2025-11-16 20:36:07 -08:00
2025-07-10 21:50:46 -04:00
2025-11-15 22:47:38 -05:00
2025-11-16 20:36:07 -08:00
2024-05-15 23:19:26 +02:00
2025-04-27 15:44:11 -07:00
2025-11-16 20:36:07 -08:00
2025-11-15 22:47:38 -05:00
2023-06-25 17:14:28 +02:00
2025-11-16 00:55:28 -05:00
2025-11-16 00:55:28 -05:00
2025-11-16 00:55:28 -05:00
2025-06-14 17:24:36 +02:00
2025-11-15 22:47:38 -05:00
2025-09-28 20:57:59 -07:00
2025-11-16 20:36:07 -08:00
2025-01-03 08:29:36 -08:00
2025-11-15 22:47:38 -05:00