zeertzjq a04c73cc17 fix(input): discard following keys when discarding <Cmd>/K_LUA (#36498) ...

Technically the current behavior does match documentation. However, the
keys following <Cmd>/K_LUA aren't normally received by vim.on_key()
callbacks either, so it does makes sense to discard them along with the
preceding key.

One may also argue that vim.on_key() callbacks should instead receive
the following keys together with the <Cmd>/K_LUA, but doing that may
cause some performance problems, and even in that case the keys should
still be discarded together.

2025-11-20 12:33:02 +08:00

..

nvim

refactor(spellfile): config() interface, docs #36481

2025-11-09 21:51:39 -08:00

uv

build(deps): bump luv to 1.51.0-1

2025-05-17 10:59:14 +02:00

vim

fix(input): discard following keys when discarding <Cmd>/K_LUA (#36498)

2025-11-20 12:33:02 +08:00

coxpcall.lua

build: add luals check

2025-02-09 18:10:54 +01:00

editorconfig.lua

fix(editorconfig): a custom property is treated as a section (#34445)

2025-06-11 08:26:38 -05:00

man.lua

refactor(lua): consistent use of local aliases

2025-08-28 11:34:01 +02:00

tohtml.lua

feat(tui): add nvim_ui_send (#35406)

2025-08-22 15:05:43 -05:00