Files
neovim/test/functional/lua
Luis Calle 79fd0b6655 fix(vim.range): empty ranges semantics vs regular ranges #39474
Problem:
- Empty ranges have different `<`, `<=`, `has` and `intersect` semantics compared to regular ranges.
- `to_inclusive_pos` assumes that the end position of a range is exclusive, which is not true for empty ranges

Solution:
Special case empty ranges in these operations.

(cherry picked from commit 416f3482e7)
2026-05-08 10:17:30 +00:00
..
2025-01-09 09:26:45 -08:00
2026-04-24 20:18:19 +02:00
2026-03-29 13:36:56 +02:00