Files
neovim/test/functional/lua/range_spec.lua
Luis Calle f3c2eb49ba feat: extend vim.Pos, vim.Range #36397
Problem:
Using nested `vim.Pos` objects to represent each `vim.Range` object
requires 3 tables for each `vim.Range`, which may be undesirable in
performance critical code. Using key-value tables performs worse than
using array-like tables (lists).

Solution:
Use array-like indices for the internal fields of both `vim.Pos` and
`vim.Range` objects. Use a metatable to allow users to access them like
if they were key-value tables.

---

Problem:
The `vim.Pos` conversion interface for `extmark` indexing does not take
into account the difference in how a position on top of a newline is
represented in `vim.Pos` and `extmark`.
- `vim.Pos`: for a newline at the end of row `n`, `row` takes the value
  `n + 1` and `col` takes the value `0`.
- `extmark`: for a newline at the end of for `n`, `row` takes the value
  `n` and `col` takes the value `#row_text`.

Solution:
Handle this in the `extmark` interface.

---

Problem:
Not all `to_xxx` interfaces have wrapping objects like `to_lsp`.

Solution:
Return unwrapped values in `to_xxx` interfaces where it makes sense.
Accept unwrapped values in "from" interfaces where it makes sense.

---

Problem:
`start` and `end` positions have different semantics, so they can't be
compared. `vim.Range` relies on comparing the `end` and `start` of two
ranges to decide which one is greater, which doesn't work as expected
because this of the different semantics.

For example, for the ranges:

    local a = {
      start = { row = 0, col = 22, },
      end_ = { row = 0, col = 24, },
    }
    local b = {
      start = { row = 0, col = 17, },
      end_ = { row = 0, col = 22, },
    }

in this code:

    local foo, bar = "foo",  "bar"
    --               |---||-|
    --                 b  a

The range `b` is smaller than the range `a`, but the current
implementation compares `b._end` (`col = 22`) and `a.start` (`col = 22`)
and concludes that, since `b.col` is not smaller than `a.col`, `b`
should be greater than `a`.

Solution:
- Use a `to_inclusive_pos` to normalize end positions inside of
  `vim.Range` whenever a comparison between a start and an end position
  is necessary.
2026-03-29 11:22:40 -04:00

103 lines
2.6 KiB
Lua

-- Test suite for vim.range
local t = require('test.testutil')
local n = require('test.functional.testnvim')()
local eq = t.eq
local clear = n.clear
local exec_lua = n.exec_lua
local insert = n.insert
describe('vim.range', function()
before_each(clear)
it('creates a range with or without optional fields', function()
local range = exec_lua(function()
return vim.range(3, 5, 4, 6)
end)
eq(3, range[1])
eq(5, range[2])
eq(4, range[3])
eq(6, range[4])
eq(nil, range[5])
local buf = exec_lua(function()
return vim.api.nvim_create_buf(false, true)
end)
range = exec_lua(function()
return vim.range(3, 5, 4, 6, { buf = buf })
end)
eq(buf, range[5])
end)
it('creates a range from two positions when optional fields are not matched', function()
local range = exec_lua(function()
return vim.range(vim.pos(3, 5), vim.pos(4, 6))
end)
eq(3, range[1])
eq(5, range[2])
eq(4, range[3])
eq(6, range[4])
eq(nil, range[5])
local buf1 = exec_lua(function()
return vim.api.nvim_create_buf(false, true)
end)
range = exec_lua(function()
return vim.range(vim.pos(3, 5, { buf = buf1 }), vim.pos(4, 6, { buf = buf1 }))
end)
eq(buf1, range[5])
local buf2 = exec_lua(function()
return vim.api.nvim_create_buf(false, true)
end)
local success = exec_lua(function()
return pcall(function()
return vim.range(vim.pos(3, 5, { buf = buf1 }), vim.pos(4, 6, { buf = buf2 }))
end)
end)
eq(success, false)
end)
it('converts between vim.Range and lsp.Range', function()
local buf = exec_lua(function()
return vim.api.nvim_get_current_buf()
end)
insert('Neovim 是 Vim 的分支,专注于扩展性和可用性。')
local lsp_range = exec_lua(function()
local range = vim.range(0, 10, 0, 36, { buf = buf })
return range:to_lsp('utf-16')
end)
eq({
['start'] = { line = 0, character = 8 },
['end'] = { line = 0, character = 20 },
}, lsp_range)
local range = exec_lua(function()
return vim.range.lsp(buf, lsp_range, 'utf-16')
end)
eq({
0,
10,
0,
36,
buf,
}, range)
end)
it('checks whether a range contains a position', function()
eq(
true,
exec_lua(function()
return vim.range(0, 0, 1, 5):has(vim.pos(0, 1))
end)
)
end)
it('checks whether a range does not contain an empty range just outside it', function()
eq(
false,
exec_lua(function()
return vim.range(0, 0, 0, 4):has(vim.range(0, 0, 0, 0))
end)
)
end)
end)