fix regression with generic params in static type (#24075)

Caught in https://github.com/metagn/applicates, I'm not sure which
commit causes this but it's also in the 2.0 branch (but not 2.0.2), so
it's not any recent PRs.

If a proc has a static parameter with type `static Foo[T]`, then another
parameter with type `static Bar[T, U]`, the generic instantiation for
`Bar` doesn't match `U` which has type `tyGenericParam`, but matches `T`
since it has type `tyTypeDesc`. The reason is that `concreteType`
returns the type itself for `tyTypeDesc` if `c.isNoCall` (i.e. matching
a generic invocation), but returns `nil` for `tyGenericParam`. I'm
guessing `tyGenericParam` is received here because of #22618, but that
doesn't explain why `T` is still `tyTypeDesc`. I'm not sure.

Regardless, we can just copy the behavior for `tyTypeDesc` to
`tyGenericParam` and also return the type itself when `c.isNoCall`. This
feels like it defeats the purpose of `concreteType` but the way it's
used doesn't make sense without it (generic param can't match another
generic param?). Alternatively we could loosen the `if concrete == nil:
return isNone` checks in some places for specific conditions, whether
`c.isNoCall` or `c.inGenericContext == 0` (though this would need

(cherry picked from commit 24e5b21c90)

compiler/sigmatch.nim

@@ -379,6 +379,7 @@ proc concreteType(c: TCandidate, t: PType; f: PType = nil): PType =
     else: result = t
   of tyGenericParam, tyAnything, tyConcept:
     result = t
+    if c.isNoCall: return
     while true:
       result = PType(idTableGet(c.bindings, t))
       if result == nil:

tests/generics/tuninstantiatedgenericcalls.nim

@@ -163,3 +163,15 @@ block: # issue #23339
       outerField: Inner[O.aToB]
   var x: Outer[A]
   doAssert typeof(x.outerField.innerField) is B
+
+block: # weird regression
+  type
+    Foo[T] = distinct int
+    Bar[T, U] = distinct int
+  proc foo[T, U](x: static Foo[T], y: static Bar[T, U]): Foo[T] =
+    # signature gives:
+    # Error: cannot instantiate Bar
+    # got: <typedesc[T], U>
+    # but expected: <T, U>
+    x
+  doAssert foo(Foo[int](1), Bar[int, int](2)).int == 1