revert to old behaviour: tuple field names are not ignored anymore; fixes #1920

This commit is contained in:
Araq
2015-01-18 02:33:28 +01:00
parent a2b7e6c392
commit abb738146a
9 changed files with 40 additions and 17 deletions

View File

@@ -439,12 +439,24 @@ proc changeType(n: PNode, newType: PType, check: bool) =
let tup = newType.skipTypes({tyGenericInst})
if tup.kind != tyTuple:
internalError(n.info, "changeType: no tuple type for constructor")
elif newType.n == nil: discard
elif sonsLen(n) > 0 and n.sons[0].kind == nkExprColonExpr:
for i in countup(0, sonsLen(n) - 1):
var m = n.sons[i].sons[0]
if m.kind != nkSym:
internalError(m.info, "changeType(): invalid tuple constr")
return
var f = getSymFromList(newType.n, m.sym.name)
if f == nil:
internalError(m.info, "changeType(): invalid identifier")
return
changeType(n.sons[i].sons[1], f.typ, check)
else:
for i in countup(0, sonsLen(n) - 1):
var m = n.sons[i]
if m.kind == nkExprColonExpr:
m = m.sons[1]
n.sons[i] = m
var a = newNodeIT(nkExprColonExpr, m.info, newType.sons[i])
addSon(a, newSymNode(newType.n.sons[i].sym))
addSon(a, m)
changeType(m, tup.sons[i], check)
of nkCharLit..nkUInt64Lit:
if check:

View File

@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ proc recordRel(c: var TCandidate, f, a: PType): TTypeRelation =
var y = a.n.sons[i].sym
if f.kind == tyObject and typeRel(c, x.typ, y.typ) < isSubtype:
return isNone
if x.name.id != y.name.id and f.kind != tyTuple: return isNone
if x.name.id != y.name.id: return isNone
proc allowsNil(f: PType): TTypeRelation {.inline.} =
result = if tfNotNil notin f.flags: isSubtype else: isNone

View File

@@ -781,6 +781,15 @@ proc sameTuple(a, b: PType, c: var TSameTypeClosure): bool =
result = sameTypeAux(x, y, c)
if not result: return
if a.n != nil and b.n != nil and IgnoreTupleFields notin c.flags:
for i in countup(0, sonsLen(a.n) - 1):
# check field names:
if a.n.sons[i].kind == nkSym and b.n.sons[i].kind == nkSym:
var x = a.n.sons[i].sym
var y = b.n.sons[i].sym
result = x.name.id == y.name.id
if not result: break
else: internalError(a.n.info, "sameTuple")
template ifFastObjectTypeCheckFailed(a, b: PType, body: stmt) {.immediate.} =
if tfFromGeneric notin a.flags + b.flags:

View File

@@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ algorithm (in pseudo-code) determines type equality:
result = typeEqualsAux(a.baseType, b.baseType, s) and
typeEqualsAux(a.indexType, b.indexType, s)
of tuple:
# Note: tuple field names are ignored
if a.tupleLen == b.tupleLen:
for i in 0..a.tupleLen-1:
if not typeEqualsAux(a[i], b[i], s): return false

View File

@@ -508,8 +508,8 @@ defines an *order* of the fields. Tuples are meant for heterogeneous storage
types with no overhead and few abstraction possibilities. The constructor ``()``
can be used to construct tuples. The order of the fields in the constructor
must match the order of the tuple's definition. Different tuple-types are
*equivalent* if they specify the same types in the same
order. The *names* of the fields are ignored.
*equivalent* if they specify the same fields of the same type in the same
order. The *names* of the fields also have to be identical.
The assignment operator for tuples copies each component.
The default assignment operator for objects copies each component. Overloading
@@ -527,8 +527,6 @@ in future versions of the compiler.
person = (name: "Peter", age: 30)
# the same, but less readable:
person = ("Peter", 30)
# the same, but with confusing tuple field names:
person = (creditCard: "Peter", id: 20)
The implementation aligns the fields for best access performance. The alignment
is compatible with the way the C compiler does it.

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
discard """
output: '''61, 125
89'''
output: '''61, 125'''
"""
proc `^` (a, b: int): int =
@@ -13,7 +12,3 @@ var n = (56, 3)
m = (n[0] + m[1], m[1] ^ n[1])
echo m[0], ", ", m[1]
var x = (bar: 38)
x = (foo: 89)
echo x[0]

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
# bug #1920
import tables
var p: OrderedTable[tuple[a:int], int]
var q: OrderedTable[tuple[x:int], int]
for key in p.keys:
echo key.a
for key in q.keys:
echo key.x

View File

@@ -7,9 +7,7 @@ version 0.10
prevent 'not 4 == 5' from compiling. -> requires 'mixin' annotation for procs!
- parameter lists without type end up in 'experimental'
- iterators always require a return type
- revert tuple behaviour
- c2nim depends on the compiler
- make nimble part of the distribution
- split idetools into separate tool
- split docgen into separate tool

View File

@@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ News
- Parameter names are finally properly ``gensym``'ed. This can break
templates though that used to rely on the fact that they are not. However
we found none such beast in the wild. (Bug #1915.)
- Tuple field names are not ignored anymore, this caused too many problems
in practice so now the behaviour as it was for version 0.9.6: If field
names exist for the tuple type, they are checked.
Language Additions