rename writeln to writeLine in doc

doc/astspec.txt

@@ -222,13 +222,13 @@ Call with named arguments
 Concrete syntax:
 
 .. code-block:: nim
-  writeln(file=stdout, "hallo")
+  writeLine(file=stdout, "hallo")
 
 AST:
 
 .. code-block:: nim
   nnkCall(
-    nnkIdent(!"writeln"),
+    nnkIdent(!"writeLine"),
     nnkExprEqExpr(
       nnkIdent(!"file"),
       nnkIdent(!"stdout")

doc/manual/generics.txt

@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ The following example shows a generic binary tree can be modelled:
   add(root, newNode("hallo")) # instantiates generic procs ``newNode`` and
   add(root, newNode("world")) # ``add``
   for str in inorder(root):
-    writeln(stdout, str)
+    writeLine(stdout, str)
 
 
 Is operator

doc/manual/procs.txt

@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ to supply any type of first argument for procedures:
   echo("abc".len) # is the same as echo(len("abc"))
   echo("abc".toUpper())
   echo({'a', 'b', 'c'}.card)
-  stdout.writeln("Hallo") # the same as writeln(stdout, "Hallo")
+  stdout.writeLine("Hallo") # the same as writeLine(stdout, "Hallo")
 
 Another way to look at the method call syntax is that it provides the missing
 postfix notation.

doc/manual/templates.txt

@@ -77,10 +77,10 @@ special ``:`` syntax:
       quit("cannot open: " & fn)
       
   withFile(txt, "ttempl3.txt", fmWrite):
-    txt.writeln("line 1")
-    txt.writeln("line 2")
+    txt.writeLine("line 1")
+    txt.writeLine("line 2")
   
-In the example the two ``writeln`` statements are bound to the ``actions``
+In the example the two ``writeLine`` statements are bound to the ``actions``
 parameter.
 
 
@@ -206,8 +206,8 @@ template parameter, it is an inject'ed symbol:
       ...
       
   withFile(txt, "ttempl3.txt", fmWrite):
-    txt.writeln("line 1")
-    txt.writeln("line 2")
+    txt.writeLine("line 1")
+    txt.writeLine("line 2")
 
 
 The ``inject`` and ``gensym`` pragmas are second class annotations; they have
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ variable number of arguments:
       # add a call to the statement list that writes ": "
       add(result, newCall("write", newIdentNode("stdout"), newStrLitNode(": ")))
       # add a call to the statement list that writes the expressions value:
-      add(result, newCall("writeln", newIdentNode("stdout"), n[i]))
+      add(result, newCall("writeLine", newIdentNode("stdout"), n[i]))
 
   var
     a: array [0..10, int]
@@ -314,15 +314,15 @@ The macro call expands to:
 .. code-block:: nim
   write(stdout, "a[0]")
   write(stdout, ": ")
-  writeln(stdout, a[0])
+  writeLine(stdout, a[0])
 
   write(stdout, "a[1]")
   write(stdout, ": ")
-  writeln(stdout, a[1])
+  writeLine(stdout, a[1])
 
   write(stdout, "x")
   write(stdout, ": ")
-  writeln(stdout, x)
+  writeLine(stdout, x)
 
 
 Arguments that are passed to a ``varargs`` parameter are wrapped in an array
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ children.
 BindSym
 -------
 
-The above ``debug`` macro relies on the fact that ``write``, ``writeln`` and
+The above ``debug`` macro relies on the fact that ``write``, ``writeLine`` and
 ``stdout`` are declared in the system module and thus visible in the 
 instantiating context. There is a way to use bound identifiers
 (aka `symbols`:idx:) instead of using unbound identifiers. The ``bindSym`` 
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ builtin can be used for that:
       # we can bind symbols in scope via 'bindSym':
       add(result, newCall(bindSym"write", bindSym"stdout", toStrLit(n[i])))
       add(result, newCall(bindSym"write", bindSym"stdout", newStrLitNode(": ")))
-      add(result, newCall(bindSym"writeln", bindSym"stdout", n[i]))
+      add(result, newCall(bindSym"writeLine", bindSym"stdout", n[i]))
 
   var
     a: array [0..10, int]
@@ -363,17 +363,17 @@ The macro call expands to:
 .. code-block:: nim
   write(stdout, "a[0]")
   write(stdout, ": ")
-  writeln(stdout, a[0])
+  writeLine(stdout, a[0])
 
   write(stdout, "a[1]")
   write(stdout, ": ")
-  writeln(stdout, a[1])
+  writeLine(stdout, a[1])
 
   write(stdout, "x")
   write(stdout, ": ")
-  writeln(stdout, x)
+  writeLine(stdout, x)
 
-However, the symbols ``write``, ``writeln`` and ``stdout`` are already bound
+However, the symbols ``write``, ``writeLine`` and ``stdout`` are already bound
 and are not looked up again. As the example shows, ``bindSym`` does work with
 overloaded symbols implicitly.
 

doc/manual/trmacros.txt

@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ parameter is of the type ``varargs`` it is treated specially and it can match
 .. code-block:: nim
   template optWrite{
     write(f, x)
-    ((write|writeln){w})(f, y)
+    ((write|writeLine){w})(f, y)
   }(x, y: varargs[expr], f: File, w: expr) =
     w(f, x, y)
   

doc/tut2.txt

@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ for any type:
   echo("abc".len) # is the same as echo(len("abc"))
   echo("abc".toUpper())
   echo({'a', 'b', 'c'}.card)
-  stdout.writeln("Hallo") # the same as writeln(stdout, "Hallo")
+  stdout.writeLine("Hallo") # the same as writeLine(stdout, "Hallo")
 
 (Another way to look at the method call syntax is that it provides the missing
 postfix notation.)
@@ -217,9 +217,9 @@ So "pure object oriented" code is easy to write:
 .. code-block:: nim
   import strutils
 
-  stdout.writeln("Give a list of numbers (separated by spaces): ")
+  stdout.writeLine("Give a list of numbers (separated by spaces): ")
   stdout.write(stdin.readLine.split.map(parseInt).max.`$`)
-  stdout.writeln(" is the maximum!")
+  stdout.writeLine(" is the maximum!")
 
 
 Properties
@@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ containers:
   add(root, newNode("hello")) # instantiates ``newNode`` and ``add``
   add(root, "world")          # instantiates the second ``add`` proc
   for str in preorder(root):
-    stdout.writeln(str)
+    stdout.writeLine(str)
 
 The example shows a generic binary tree. Depending on context, the brackets are
 used either to introduce type parameters or to instantiate a generic proc,
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ simple proc for logging:
     debug = true
 
   proc log(msg: string) {.inline.} =
-    if debug: stdout.writeln(msg)
+    if debug: stdout.writeLine(msg)
 
   var
     x = 4
@@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ Turning the ``log`` proc into a template solves this problem:
     debug = true
 
   template log(msg: string) =
-    if debug: stdout.writeln(msg)
+    if debug: stdout.writeLine(msg)
 
   var
     x = 4
@@ -627,10 +627,10 @@ via a special ``:`` syntax:
       quit("cannot open: " & fn)
 
   withFile(txt, "ttempl3.txt", fmWrite):
-    txt.writeln("line 1")
-    txt.writeln("line 2")
+    txt.writeLine("line 1")
+    txt.writeLine("line 2")
 
-In the example the two ``writeln`` statements are bound to the ``body``
+In the example the two ``writeLine`` statements are bound to the ``body``
 parameter. The ``withFile`` template contains boilerplate code and helps to
 avoid a common bug: to forget to close the file. Note how the
 ``let fn = filename`` statement ensures that ``filename`` is evaluated only
@@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ variable number of arguments:
       # add a call to the statement list that writes ": "
       result.add(newCall("write", newIdentNode("stdout"), newStrLitNode(": ")))
       # add a call to the statement list that writes the expressions value:
-      result.add(newCall("writeln", newIdentNode("stdout"), n[i]))
+      result.add(newCall("writeLine", newIdentNode("stdout"), n[i]))
 
   var
     a: array[0..10, int]
@@ -699,15 +699,15 @@ The macro call expands to:
 .. code-block:: nim
   write(stdout, "a[0]")
   write(stdout, ": ")
-  writeln(stdout, a[0])
+  writeLine(stdout, a[0])
 
   write(stdout, "a[1]")
   write(stdout, ": ")
-  writeln(stdout, a[1])
+  writeLine(stdout, a[1])
 
   write(stdout, "x")
   write(stdout, ": ")
-  writeln(stdout, x)
+  writeLine(stdout, x)