#23992 The test case provided does not cover the Windows situation, I
fixed it in this new PR.
Fixed an issue where errorCode was always 0 when startProcess didn't use
the poEvalCommand flag.
Tthe sleep command might not be available in all Windows installations,
so I skipped the relevant test.
Added a test case, tested on my fedora and windows systems.
fixes#15314, fixes#24002
The OpenSym behavior first added to generics in #23091 now also applies
to templates, since templates can also capture symbols that are meant to
be replaced by local symbols if the context imports symbols with the
same name, as in the issue #24002. The experimental switch
`templateOpenSym` is added to enable this behavior for templates only,
and the experimental switch `openSym` is added to enable it for both
templates and generics, and the documentation now mainly mentions this
switch.
Additionally the logic for `nkOpenSymChoice` nodes that were previously
wrapped in `nkOpenSym` now apply to all `nkOpenSymChoice` nodes, and so
these nodes aren't wrapped in `nkOpenSym` anymore. This means
`nkOpenSym` can only have children of kind `nkSym` again, so it is more
in line with the structure of symchoice nodes. As for why they aren't
merged with `nkOpenSymChoice` nodes yet, we need some way to signal that
the node shouldn't become ambiguous if other options exist at
instantiation time, we already captured a symbol at the beginning and
another symbol can only replace it if it's closer in scope and
unambiguous.
updated version of #22193
After #22029 and the followups #23983 and #24005 which fixed issues with
it, `tyFromExpr` no longer match any proc params in generic type bodies
but delay all non-matching calls until the type is instantiated.
Previously the mechanism `fauxMatch` was used to pretend that any
failing match against `tyFromExpr` actually matched, but prevented the
instantiation of the type until later.
Since this mechanism is not needed anymore for `tyFromExpr`, it is now
only used for `tyError` to prevent cascading errors and changed to a
bool field for simplicity. A change in `semtypes` was also needed to
prevent calling `fitNode` on default param values resolving to type
`tyFromExpr` in generic procs for params with non-generic types, as this
would try to coerce the expression into a concrete type when it can't be
instantiated yet.
The aliases `tyProxy` and `tyUnknown` for `tyError` and `tyFromExpr` are
also removed for uniformity.
Follow up of #23927 which solves the build error.
This is still only a partial fix as it doesn't take into account
unordered enums. I'll make a separate issue for those.
---------
Co-authored-by: ringabout <43030857+ringabout@users.noreply.github.com>
This is a very niche case encountered in #24012, where an int literal
got a `range` type as a result of a generic instantiation (in
`tgenericcomputedrange`), I can't think of another test case. The base
type of the range being `int` made it match `int` with `isSubrange` as
in the first `if` branch, but other int types like `int32` matched with
`isFromIntLit` which is a better match.
Instead, int literals with range type now:
1. match their base type with `isFromIntLit`,
2. don't match other int types with `isFromIntLit`, instead giving
`isConvertible` as in the last `if` branch in `handleRange`.
fixes#4228, fixes#4990, fixes#7006, fixes#7008, fixes#8406, fixes
#8551, fixes#11112, fixes#20027, fixes#22647, refs #23854 and #23855
(remaining issue fixed), refs #8545 (works properly now with
`cast[static[bool]]` changed to `cast[bool]`), refs #22342 and #22607
(disabled tests added), succeeds #23194
Parameter and return type nodes in generic procs now undergo the same
`inGenericContext` treatment that nodes in generic type bodies do. This
allows many of the fixes in #22029 and followups to also apply to
generic proc signatures. Like #23983 however this needs some more
compiler fixes, but this time mostly in `sigmatch` and type
instantiations.
1. `tryReadingGenericParam` no longer treats `tyCompositeTypeClass` like
a concrete type anymore, so expressions like `Foo.T` where `Foo` is a
generic type don't look for a parameter of `Foo` in non-generic code
anymore. It also doesn't generate `tyFromExpr` in non-generic code for
any generic LHS. This is to handle a very specific case in `asyncmacro`
which used `FutureVar.astToStr` where `FutureVar` is generic.
2. The `tryResolvingStaticExpr` call when matching `tyFromExpr` in
sigmatch now doesn't consider call nodes in general unresolved, only
nodes with `tyFromExpr` type, which is emitted on unresolved expressions
by increasing `c.inGenericContext`. `c.inGenericContext == 0` is also
now required to attempt instantiating `tyFromExpr`. So matching against
`tyFromExpr` in proc signatures works in general now, but I'm
speculating it depends on constant folding in `semExpr` for statics to
match against it properly.
3. `paramTypesMatch` now doesn't try to change nodes with `tyFromExpr`
type into `tyStatic` type when fitting to a static type, because it
doesn't need to, they'll be handled the same way (this was a workaround
in place of the static type instantiation changes, only one of the
fields in the #22647 test doesn't work with it).
4. `tyStatic` matching now uses `inferStaticParam` instead of just range
type matching, so `Foo[N div 2]` can infer `N` in the same way `array[N
div 2, int]` can. `inferStaticParam` also disabled itself if the
inferred static param type already had a node, but `makeStaticExpr`
generates static types with unresolved nodes, so we only disable it if
it also doesn't have a binding. This might not work very well but the
static type instantiation changes should really lower the amount of
cases where it's encountered.
5. Static types now undergo type instantiation. Previously the branch
for `tyStatic` in `semtypinst` was a no-op, now it acts similarly to
instantiating any other type with the following differences:
- Other types only need instantiation if `containsGenericType` is true,
static types also get instantiated if their value node isn't a literal
node. Ideally any value node that is "already evaluated" should be
ignored, but I'm not sure of a better way to check this, maybe if
`evalConstExpr` emitted a flag. This is purely for optimization though.
- After instantiation, `semConstExpr` is called on the value node if
`not cl.allowMetaTypes` and the type isn't literally a `static` type.
Then the type of the node is set to the base type of the static type to
deal with `semConstExpr` stripping abstract types.
We need to do this because calls like `foo(N)` where `N` is `static int`
and `foo`'s first parameter is just `int` do not generate `tyFromExpr`,
they are fully typed and so `makeStaticExpr` is called on them, giving a
static type with an unresolved node.
fixes#23898, supersedes #23966 and #23990
Since #20631 ambiguous type symbols in templates are rejected outright,
now we generate a symchoice for type nodes if they're ambiguous, a
generalization of what was done in #22375. This is done for generics as
well. Symchoices also handle type symbols better now, ensuring their
type is a `typedesc` type; this probably isn't necessary for everything
to work but it makes the logic more robust.
Similar to #23989, we have to prepare for the fact that ambiguous type
symbols behave differently than normal type symbols and either error
normally or relegate to other routine symbols if the symbol is being
called. Generating a symchoice emulates this behavior, `semExpr` will
find the type symbol first, but since the symchoice has other symbols,
it will count as an ambiguous type symbol.
I know it seems spammy to carry around an ambiguity flag everywhere, but
in the future when we have something like #23104 we could just always
generate a symchoice, and the symchoice itself would carry the info of
whether the first symbol was ambiguous. But this could harm compiler
performance/memory use, it might be better to generate it only when we
have to, which in the case of type symbols is only when they're
ambiguous.
It speeds up
```nim
proc foo =
let piece = cast[seq[char]](newSeqUninit[uint8](5220600386'i64))
foo()
```
Notes that `cast[ref](...)` is excluded because we need to keep the ref
alive if the parameter is something with pointer types (e.g.
`cast[ref](pointer)`or `cast[ref](makePointer(...))`)
---------
Co-authored-by: Andreas Rumpf <rumpf_a@web.de>
fixes#21258
When a generic proc is instantiated, if one of the default values
doesn't match the type of the parameter, `seminst` sets the default
parameter node to an `nkEmpty` node with `tyError` type. `sigmatch`
checks for this to give an error message if the default param is
actually used, but only while actively matching the proc signature,
before the proc is even instantiated. The error message also gives very
little information.
Now, we check for this in `updateDefaultParams` at the end of
`semResolvedCall`, after the proc has been instantiated. The `nkEmpty`
node also is given the original mismatching type instead rather than
`tyError`, only setting `tyError` after erroring to prevent cascading
errors. The error message is changed to the standard type mismatch error
also giving the instantiation info of the routine.
fixes#19737
As in the diff, `semResolvedCall` sets the return type of a call to a
proc to the type of the call. But in the case of the [subscript
magic](https://nim-lang.org/docs/system.html#%5B%5D%2CT%2CI), this type
is the first generic param which is also supposed to be the type of the
first argument, but this is invalid, the correct type is the element
type eventually given by `semSubscript`. Some lines above also [prevent
the subscript magics from instantiating their
params](dda638c1ba/compiler/semcall.nim (L699))
so this type ends up being an unresolved generic param.
Since the type of the node is not `nil`, `prepareOperand` doesn't try to
type it again, and this unresolved generic param type ends up being the
final type of the node. To prevent this, we just never set the type of
the node if we encountered a subscript magic.
Maybe we could also rename the generic parameters of the subscript
magics to stuff like `DummyT`, `DummyI` if we want this to be easier to
debug in the future.
fixes#23998
In `fitNode` the first symbol of a symchoice that expects an enum type
with the same enum type is given as the result of the `fitNode`. But
`getConstExpr` is also called on it, which will return a `nil` node for
nodes that aren't constant but have the enum type, like variables or
proc parameters. Instead we just return the node directly since it's
already typed.
Normally, this `if` branch in `fitNode` shouldn't exist since
`paramTypesMatch` handles it, but the way pure enum symbols work makes
it really impractical to check their ambiguity, which `paramTypesMatch`
won't like. If it causes problems for regular enums we can restrict this
branch to just pure enums until they are hopefully eventually removed.
fixes#23893
When type symbols are ambiguous, calls to them aren't allowed to be type
conversions and only routine symbols are considered instead. But the
compiler doesn't acknowledge that qualified symbols can be ambiguous,
`qualifiedLookUp` directly tries to access the identifier from the
module string table. Now it checks the relevant symbol iterators for any
symbol after the first received symbol, in which case the symbol is
considered ambiguous. `nkDotExpr` is also included in the whitelist of
node kinds for ambiguous type symbols (not entirely sure why this
exists, it's missing `nkAccQuoted` as well).
fixes#23406, closes#23854, closes#23855 (test code of both compiles
but separate issue exists), refs #23432, follows #23411
In generic bodies, previously all regular `nkCall` nodes like `foo(a,
b)` were directly treated as generic statements and delayed immediately,
but other call kinds like `a.foo(b)`, `foo a, b` etc underwent
typechecking before making sure they have to be delayed, as implemented
in #22029. Since the behavior for `nkCall` was slightly buggy (as in
#23406), the behavior for all call kinds is now to call `semTypeExpr`.
However the vast majority of calls in generic bodies out there are
`nkCall`, and while there isn't a difference in the expected behavior,
this exposes many issues with the implementation started in #22029 given
how much more code uses it now. The portion of these issues that CI has
caught are fixed in this PR but it's possible there are more.
1. Deref expressions, dot expressions and calls to dot expressions now
handle and propagate `tyFromExpr`. This is most of the changes in
`semexprs`.
2. For deref expressions to work in `typeof`, a new type flag
`tfNonConstExpr` is added for `tyFromExpr` that calls `semExprWithType`
with `efInTypeof` on the expression instead of `semConstExpr`. This type
flag is set for every `tyFromExpr` type of a node that `prepareNode`
encounters, so that the node itself isn't evaluated at compile time when
just trying to get the type of the node.
3. Unresolved `static` types matching `static` parameters is now treated
the same as unresolved generic types matching `typedesc` parameters in
generic type bodies, it causes a failed match which delays the call
instantiation.
4. `typedesc` parameters now reject all types containing unresolved
generic types like `seq[T]`, not just generic param types by themselves.
(using `containsGenericType`)
5. `semgnrc` now doesn't leave generic param symbols it encounters in
generic type contexts as just identifiers, and instead turns them into
symbol nodes. Normally in generic procs, this isn't a problem since the
generic param symbols will be provided again at instantiation time (and
in fact creating symbol nodes causes issues since `seminst` doesn't
actually instantiate proc body node types).
But generic types can try to be instantiated early in `sigmatch` which
will give an undeclared identifier error when the param is not provided.
Nodes in generic types (specifically in `tyFromExpr` which should be the
only use for `semGenericStmt`) undergo full generic type instantiation
with `prepareNode`, so there is no issue of these symbols remaining as
uninstantiated generic types.
6. `prepareNode` now has more logic for which nodes to avoid
instantiating.
Subscripts and subscripts turned into calls to `[]` by `semgnrc` need to
avoid instantiating the first operand, since it may be a generic body
type like `Generic` in an expression like `Generic[int]`.
Dot expressions cannot instantiate their RHS as it may be a generic proc
symbol or even an undeclared identifier for generic param fields, but
have to instantiate their LHS, so calls and subscripts need to still
instantiate their first node if it's a dot expression.
This logic still isn't perfect and needs the same level of detail as in
`semexprs` for which nodes can be left as "untyped" for overloading/dot
exprs/subscripts to handle, but should handle the majority of cases.
Also the `efDetermineType` requirement for which calls become
`tyFromExpr` is removed and as a result `efDetermineType` is entirely
unused again.
fixes#19848
Not sure why this wasn't the case already. The `if cl.allowMetaTypes:
return` line below for `tyFromExpr` [was added 10 years
ago](d5798b43de).
Hopefully it was just negligence?
fixes#8697, fixes#9620, fixes#23265
When matching a `template` with an `untyped` argument fails because of a
mismatching typed argument, `presentFailedCandidates` tries to sem every
single argument to show their types, but trying to type the `untyped`
argument can fail if it's supposed to use an injected symbol, so we get
an unrelated error message like "undeclared identifier".
Instead we use `tryExpr` as the comment suggests, setting the type to
`untyped` if it fails to compile. We could also maybe check if an
`untyped` argument is expected in its place and not try to compile the
expression if it is but this would require a bit of reorganizing the
code here and IMO it's better to have the information of what type it
would be if it can be typed.
fixes#23977
The problem is that for *any* body of a generic declaration,
[semstmts](2e4d344b43/compiler/semstmts.nim (L1610-L1611))
sets the sym of its value to the generic type name, and
[semtypes](2e4d344b43/compiler/semtypes.nim (L2143))
just directly gives the referenced type *specifically* when the
expression is a generic body. I'm blaming `semtypes` here because it's
responsible for the type given but the exact opposite behavior
specifically written in makes me think generating an alias type here
maybe breaks something.
fixes#10753, fixes#22021, refs #19365 (was fixed by #22029, but more
faithful test added)
For whatever reason `compileTime` proc calls did not fold if the proc
was generic ([since this folding was
introduced](c25ffbf262 (diff-539da3a63df08fa987f1b0c67d26cdc690753843d110b6bf0805a685eeaffd40))).
I'm guessing the intention was for *unresolved* generic procs to not
fold, which is now the logic.
Non-magic `compileTime` procs also now don't fold at compile time in
`typeof` contexts to avoid possible runtime errors (only the important)
and prevent double/needless evaluation.
fixes#23689
Normally pure enum symbols only "exist" in lookup if nothing else with
the same name is in scope. But if an expression is expected to be an
enum type, we know that ambiguity can be resolved between different
symbols based on their type, so we can include the normally inaccessible
pure enum fields in the ambiguity resolution in the case that the
expected enum type is actually a pure enum. This handles the use case in
the issue of the type inference for enums reverted in #23588.
I know pure enums are supposed to be on their way out so this might seem
excessive, but the `pure` pragma can't be removed in the code in the
issue due to a redefinition error, they have to be separated into
different modules. Normal enums can still resolve the ambiguity here
though. I always think about making a list of all the remaining use
cases for pure enums and I always forget.
Will close#23694 if CI passes
fixes#22850
The `is` operator checks the type of the left hand side, and if it's
generic or if it's a `typedesc` type with no base type, it leaves it to
be evaluated later. But `typedesc` types with no base type precisely
describe the default typeclass `type`/`typeclass`, so this condition is
removed. Maybe at some point this represented an unresolved generic
type?
fixes#22571
Removes the hack added in #13589 which made non-top-level object type
symbols `gensym` because they couldn't be mangled into different names
for codegen vs. top-level types. Now we consider the new `disamb` field
(added in #21667) of the type symbols in the type hash (which is used
for the mangled name) to differentiate between the types.
In other parts of the compiler, specifically the [proc
mangling](298ada3412/compiler/mangleutils.nim (L59)),
`itemId.item` is used instead of the `disamb` field, but I didn't use it
in case it's the outdated method.
Previous example wouldn't run unless `std/posix` was imported and it
wasn't mentioned anywhere in the docs.
Other changes in the example:
- replaced magic number with constant `MaxWatches` .
- changed seq buffer to array, because length is already constant +
pointer is a bit nicer: `addr seq[0]` vs `addr arr`
- added example for getting a `cstring` name value from `InotifyEvent`
struct with explicit cast.
- added a bit more description to `inotify_init1` (copied from `man
inotify(7)`)
---------
Co-authored-by: ringabout <43030857+ringabout@users.noreply.github.com>
Provides a fix for #23817.
With target `arm-none-eabi`, GCC defines `int32_t` to `long int`. Nim
uses `__builtin_sadd_overflow` for 32-bit targets, but this emits
warnings on GCC releases 13 and under, while generating an error on GCC
14. More info regarding this
[here](https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-14/porting_to.html#c) and
[here](https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-cvs/2023-December/394351.html).
The proposed PR attempts to address this issue for these targets by
defining the `nimAddInt`, `nimSubInt`, and `nimMulInt` macros to use the
appropriate compiler intrinsics for this platform.
As for as we know, the LLVM toolchain for bare metal Arm does not define
`int32_t` as `long int` and has no need for this patch. Thus, we only
define the above macros for GCC targeting `arm-non-eabi`.
