fixes#23730
Since #23188 the compiler errors when matching a type variable to an
uninstantiated static value. However sometimes an uninstantiated static
value is given even when only a type match is being performed to the
base type of the static type, in the given issue this case is:
```nim
proc foo[T: SomeInteger](x: T): int = int(x)
proc bar(x: static int): array[foo(x), int] = discard
discard bar(123)
```
To deal with this issue we only error when matching against a type
variable constrained to `static`.
Not sure if the `q.typ.kind == tyGenericParam and
q.typ.genericConstraint == tyStatic` check is necessary, the code above
for deciding whether the variable becomes `skConst` doesn't use it.
(cherry picked from commit 128090c593)
fixes#23690
```nim
dest.`:state` = src.`:state`
var :tmp_553651276 = dest.e1.a
`=wasMoved`(dest.e1.a)
dest.e1.a.kind = src.e1.a.kind
case dest.e1.a.kind
of 0:
dest.e1.a.a = src.e1.a.a
of 1:
`=copy`(dest.e1.a.c, src.e1.a.c)
case :tmp_553651276.kind
of 0:
of 1:
`=destroy`(:tmp_553651276.c)
```
`dest.e1.a.kind = src.e1.a.kind` changes the discrimant but it fails to
clear the memory of `dest.e1.a`. Before using hooks for copying, we need
to clear the dest, e.g. `=wasMoved(dest.e1.a.c)`.
```nim
dest.`:state` = src.`:state`
var :tmp_553651276 = dest.e1.a
`=wasMoved`(dest.e1.a)
dest.e1.a.kind = src.e1.a.kind
case dest.e1.a.kind
of 0:
`=wasMoved`(dest.e1.a.a)
dest.e1.a.a = src.e1.a.a
`=wasMoved`(dest.e1.a.b)
of 1:
`=wasMoved`(dest.e1.a.c)
`=copy`(dest.e1.a.c, src.e1.a.c)
case :tmp_553651276.kind
of 0:
of 1:
`=destroy`(:tmp_553651276.c)
```
(cherry picked from commit 262ff648aa)
I could trivially port Nim to NetBSD/aarch64 because it already
supported NetBSD and aarch64. I only needed to generate `c_code` for
this combination.
(cherry picked from commit 0ba932132e)
fixes#23419
`void` is only supported as fields of objects/tuples. It shouldn't allow
void in the array.
I didn't merge it with taField because that flag is also used for
tyLent, which is allowed in the fields of other types.
(cherry picked from commit 185e06c923)
fixes#23321
In the function `mapType`, ptrs (tyPtr, tyVar, tyLent, tyRef)
are mapped into ctPtrToArray, the dereference of which is skipped
in the `genref`. We need to skip these ptrs in the function
`genOpenArraySlice`.
(cherry picked from commit d09c3c0f58)
Previously, in certain cases, the compiler would generate debug info for
the correct line number, but for the wrong .nim source file.
(cherry picked from commit 7e3bac9235)
This solution should resolve the nimsuggest crash issue. However,
perhaps the problem is in the parser?
fix#23518
(cherry picked from commit 60af04635f)
fixes#23326
In a routine declaration node in a template, if the routine is marked as
`gensym`, the compiler adds it as a new symbol to a preliminary scope of
the template. If it's not marked as gensym, then it searches the
preliminary scope of the template for the name of the routine, then when
it matches a template parameter or a gensym identifier, the compiler
replaces the name node with a symbol node of the found symbol.
This makes sense for the template parameter since it has to be replaced
later, but not really for the gensym identifier, as it doesn't allow us
to inject a routine with the same name as an identifier previously
declared as gensym (the problem in #23326 is when this is in another
`when` branch).
However this is the only channel to reuse a gensym symbol in a
declaration, so maybe removing it has side effects. For example if we
have:
```nim
proc foo(x: int) {.gensym.} = discard
proc foo(x: float) {.gensym.} = discard
```
it will not behave the same as
```nim
proc foo(x: int) {.gensym.} = discard
proc foo(x: float) = discard
```
behaved previously, which maybe allowed overloading over the gensym'd
symbols.
A note to the "undeclared identifier" error message has also been added
for a potential error code that implicitly depended on the old behavior
might give, namely ``undeclared identifier: 'abc`gensym123'``, which
happens when in a template an identifier is first declared gensym in
code that doesn't compile, then as a routine which injects by default,
then the identifier is used.
(cherry picked from commit 73b0b0d31c)
Unfortunately we cant trick the debugger when targeting C++ so this one
also needs to wait for our own debugger adapter.
(cherry picked from commit 90fe1b340f)
Currently, I don't have syntax highlighting (+ no/wrong
jump-to-definition) for some import statement forms, namely:
- `import module/name/with/(slashes)`
- `import (mod) as alias`
- `import basemod/[ (sub1), (sub2) ]`
With this patch, highlight/def will work for the regions indicated by
parentheses.
(cherry picked from commit 15577043e8)
fixes#23568, fixes#23310
In #23091 `semFinishOperands` was changed to not be called for `mArrGet`
and `mArrPut`, presumably in preparation for #23188 (not sure why it was
needed in #23091, maybe they got mixed together), since the compiler
handles these later and needs the first argument to not be completely
"typed" since brackets can serve as explicit generic instantiations in
which case the first argument would have to be an unresolved generic
proc (not accepted by `finishOperand`).
In this PR we just make it so `mArrGet` and `mArrPut` specifically skip
calling `finishOperand` on the first argument. This way the generic
arguments in the explicit instantiation get typed, but not the
unresolved generic proc.
(cherry picked from commit 09bd9d0b19)
refs #23091, especially post merge comments
Unsure if `experimental` and `bind` are the perfect constructs to use
but they seem to get the job done here. Symbol nodes do not get marked
`nfOpenSym` if the `bind` statement is used for their symbol, and
`nfOpenSym` nodes do not get replaced by new local symbols if the
experimental switch is not enabled in the local context (meaning it also
works with `push experimental`). However this incurs a warning as the
fact that the node is marked `nfOpenSym` means we did not `bind` it, so
we might want to do that or turn on the experimental switch if we didn't
intend to bind it.
The experimental switch name is arbitrary and could be changed.
---------
Co-authored-by: Andreas Rumpf <rumpf_a@web.de>
(cherry picked from commit 4b1a841707)
fixes#23186
As explained in #23186, generics can transform `genericProc[int]` into a
call `` `[]`(genericProc, int) `` which causes a problem when
`genericProc` is resemmed, since it is not a resolved generic proc. `[]`
needs unresolved generic procs since `mArrGet` also handles explicit
generic instantiations, so delay the resolved generic proc check to
`semFinishOperands` which is intentionally not called for `mArrGet`.
The root issue for
[t6137](https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/blob/devel/tests/generics/t6137.nim)
is also fixed (because this change breaks it otherwise), the compiler
doesn't consider the possibility that an assigned generic param can be
an unresolved static value (note the line `if t.kind == tyStatic: s.ast
= t.n` below the change in sigmatch), now it properly errors that it
couldn't instantiate it as it would for a type param. ~~The change in
semtypinst is just for symmetry with the code above it which also gives
a `cannot instantiate` error, it may or may not be necessary/correct.~~
Now removed, I don't think it was correct.
Still possible that this has unintended consequences.
(cherry picked from commit e8092a5470)
fixes#22605, separated from #22744
This marks symbol captures in macro calls in generic contexts as
`nfOpenSym`, which means if there is a new symbol in the local
instantiatied body during instantiation time, this symbol replaces the
captured symbol. We have to be careful not to consider symbols outside
of the instantiation body during instantiation, because this will leak
symbols from the instantiation context scope rather than the original
declaration scope. This is done by checking if the local context owner
(maybe should be the symbol of the proc currently getting instantiated
instead? not sure how to get this) is the same as or a parent owner of
the owner of the replacement candidate symbol.
This solution is distinct from the symchoice mechanisms which we
originally assumed had to be related, if this assumption was wrong it
would explain why this solution took so long to arrive at.
(cherry picked from commit 941659581a)
fixes#22597
```nim
proc autoToOpenArray*[T](s: Slice[T]): openArray[T] =
echo "here twice"
result = toOpenArray(s.p, s.first, s.last)
```
For functions returning openarray types, `fixupCall` creates a temporary
variable to store the return value: `let tmp = autoToOpenArray()`. But
`genOpenArrayConv` cannot handle openarray assignements with side
effects. It should have stored the right part of the assignment first
instead of calling the right part twice.
(cherry picked from commit d44b0b1869)
fixes#23200, fixes#18866
not turned to `tyUntyped`. This had the side effect that anything
previously bound to `tyAnything` in the proc type match was then bound
to the proc return type, which is wrong since we don't know the proc
return type even if we know the expected parameter types (`tyUntyped`
also [does not care about its previous bindings in
`typeRel`](ab4278d217/compiler/sigmatch.nim (L1059-L1061))
maybe for this reason).
Now we mark `tyAnything` return types for routines as `tfRetType` [as
done for other meta return
types](18b5fb256d/compiler/semtypes.nim (L1451)),
and ignore bindings to `tyAnything` + `tfRetType` types in `semtypinst`.
On top of this, we reset the type relation in `paramTypesMatch` only
after creating the instantiation (instead of trusting
`isInferred`/`isInferredConvertible` before creating the instantiation),
using the same mechanism that `isBothMetaConvertible` uses.
This fixes the issues as well as making the disabled t15386_2 test
introduced in #21065 work. As seen in the changes for the other tests,
the error messages give an obscure `proc (a: GenericParam): auto` now,
but it does give the correct error that the overload doesn't match
instead of matching the overload pre-emptively and expecting a specific
return type.
tsugar had to be changed due to #16906, which is the problem where
`void` is not inferred in the case where `result` was never touched.
(cherry picked from commit f46f26e79a)
…var/let symbols
fixes#22939fixes#16890
Besides, it was applied to let/const/var with pragmas, now it is
universally applied.
```nim
{.push exportc.}
proc foo =
let bar = 12
echo bar
{.pop.}
```
For example, the `bar` variable will be affected by `exportc`.
(cherry picked from commit cecaf9c56b)
