fixes#24844
it may not be used in other places except in `genTraverseProc`,
we have to generate a `typedesc` for this case, not a weak `typedec`
(cherry picked from commit a77d1cc6c1)
Also added some documentation to the header.
See: https://forum.nim-lang.org/t/13311
> I did try using the flag, but couldn't get it to work. If I do
-d:nimIoSelector, the defined check passes, but the other code fails to
compile because there is no const named nimIoSelector. It seemed like a
bug to me, do you have a working number compiler invocation?
Co-authored-by: ringabout <43030857+ringabout@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit d60e0211bc)
`DWORD` is defined as `int32`, so `DWORD(...)` would not work as
expected. When writing to files larger than 2GB, exception occurs:
```
unhandled exception: value out of range: 4294967295 notin -2147483648 .. 2147483647 [RangeDefect]
```
This PR is a quick fix for this.
P.S. Why `DWORD` is defined as `int32`?
(cherry picked from commit 4f09675d8a)
fixes#25117
errors on `requiresInit` of `result` if it is used before
initialization. Otherwise
```nim
# prevent superfluous warnings about the same variable:
a.init.add s.id
```
It produces a warning, and this line prevents it from being recognized
by the `requiresInit` check in `trackProc`
(cherry picked from commit c8456eacd5)
fixes#24093
transforms
```nim
let a = new array[1000, byte]
block:
for _ in cast[typeof(a)](a)[]:
discard
```
into
```nim
let a = new array[1000, byte]
block:
let temp = cast[typeof(a)](a)
for _ in temp[]:
discard
```
So it keeps the same behavior with the manual version
(cherry picked from commit 08d74a1c27)
Follow up to https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/25126
It changed `formatSize` outputs from some inputs, so some of existing
test code related to it need to be updated.
Sorry, I didn't know `tests/destructor/tnewruntime_strutils.nim` has
tests calls `formatSize`.
(cherry picked from commit 8ea8755cc0)
`strutils.formatSize` returns correct strings from large values close to
`int64.high`.
Round down `bytes` when it is converted to float.
(cherry picked from commit 065c4b443b)
fixes#25066
Probably it is not worth implementing comparing pointers at compile
time. For a starter, we can improve the error message instead of letting
it crash
(cherry picked from commit e2a294504e)
## Description
Fixed an inconsistency in the Nim manual's example for the `*+`
operator.
Previously, the example on line 4065 of `doc/manual.md` used variables
`a`, `b`, and `c`:
```nim
assert `*+`(3, 4, 6) == `+`(`*`(a, b), c)
```
This did not match the preceding call which directly used literals `3`,
`4`, `6`.
Updated the example to:
```nim
assert `*+`(3, 4, 6) == `+`(`*`(3, 4), 6)
```
This change makes the example consistent with the function call and
immediately understandable to readers without requiring prior variable
definitions.
## Rationale
* Improves clarity by avoiding undefined variables in a code snippet.
* Matches the example usage in the preceding line.
* Helps beginners understand the operator's behavior without additional
context.
## Changes
* **Edited**: `doc/manual.md` line 4065 — replaced variables `a`, `b`,
`c` with literals `3`, `4`, `6`.
## Issue
Closes#25084
(cherry picked from commit c6352ce0ab)
- Added support for SOCKS5h (h for proxy-side DNS resolving) to
httpclient
- Deprecated `auth` arguments for `newProxy` constructors, for auth to
be embedded in the url.
Unfortunately `http://example.com` is not currently reachable from
github CI, so the tests fail there for a few days already, I'm not sure
what can be done here.
(cherry picked from commit 161b321796)
* Add a new section to doc/tut2.md explaining interfaces.
* Provide a code example demonstrating how to simulate interfaces using
objects of closures.
* The example shows a basic IntFieldInterface with getter and setter
procedures.
This PR was inspired by the discussion in
https://forum.nim-lang.org/t/13217
---------
Co-authored-by: Emre Şafak <esafak@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Andreas Rumpf <araq4k@proton.me>
(cherry picked from commit bb93b39b58)
fixes#7179
```nim
var f = 751.0
echo f.int8
```
In this case, `int8(float)` yields different numbers for different
optimization levels, since float to int conversions are undefined
behaviors. In this PR, it mitigates this problem by conversions to same
size integers before converting to the final type: i.e.
`int8(int64(float))`, which has UB problems but is better than before
(cherry picked from commit 08d51e5c88)
A function with an illegal parameter name like
```nim
proc myproc(type: int) =
echo type
```
would uninformatively fail like so:
```nim
tkeywordparam.nim(1, 13) Error: expected closing ')'
```
This commit makes it return the following error:
```nim
tkeywordparam.nim(1, 13) Error: 'type' is a keyword and cannot be used as a parameter name
```
---------
Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Emre Şafak <esafak@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Andreas Rumpf <araq4k@proton.me>
(cherry picked from commit 9c1e3bf8fb)
revert #24896
Partially reverting #24896 in #25024 broke CI. So better revert it
completely so the CI is green. I'll investigate the issue later.
(cherry picked from commit 08642ffe34)
Reworked closureiter transformation.
- Convolutedly nested finallies should cause no problems now.
- CurrentException state now follows nim runtime rules (pushes and pops
appropriately), and mimics normal code, which is somewhat buggy, see
#25031
- Previously state optimization (removing empty states or extra jumps)
missed some opportunities, I've reimplemented it to do everything
possible to optimize the states. At this point any extra states or jumps
should be considered a bug.
The resulting codegen (compiled binaries) is also slightly smaller.
**BUT:**
- I had to change C++ reraising logic, see expt.nim. Because with
closure iters `currentException` is not always in sync with C++'s notion
of current exception. From my tests and understanding of C++ runtime
there should not be any problems, but I'm only 99% sure :)
- I've reused `nfNoRewrite` flag in one specific case during the
transformation. This flag is also used in term-rewriting logic. Again,
99% sure, these 2 scenarios will never intersect.
(cherry picked from commit 36f8cefa85)
Docs are routinely compiled on a different OS so often don't reflect
reality of CT-conditionals.
I bet there's a few of other places like this in the stdlib.
(cherry picked from commit 6bdb069a66)
