fixes#10440, fixes#13871, fixes#14665, fixes#19672, fixes#23677
The false positive in #23677 was caused by behavior in
`implicitlyDiscardable` where only the last node of `if`/`case`/`try`
etc expressions were considered, as in the final node of the final
branch (in this case `else`). To fix this we use the same iteration in
`implicitlyDiscardable` that we use in `endsInNoReturn`, with the
difference that for an `if`/`case`/`try` statement to be implicitly
discardable, all of its branches must be implicitly discardable.
`noreturn` calls are also considered implicitly discardable for this
reason, otherwise stuff like `if true: discardableCall() else: error()`
doesn't compile.
However `endsInNoReturn` also had bugs, one where `finally` was
considered in noreturn checking when it shouldn't, another where only
`nkIfStmt` was checked and not `nkIfExpr`, and the node given for the
error message was bad. So `endsInNoReturn` now skips over
`skipForDiscardable` which no longer contains
`nkIfStmt`/`nkCaseStmt`/`nkTryStmt`, stores the first encountered
returning node in a var parameter for the error message, and handles
`finally` and `nkIfExpr`.
Fixing #23677 already broke a line in `syncio` so some package code
might be affected.
(cherry picked from commit 42e8472ca6)
refs
https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/issues/23586#issuecomment-2102113750
In #20091 a bad kind of type inference was mistakenly left in where if
an identifier `abc` had an expected type of an enum type `Enum`, and
`Enum` had a member called `abc`, the identifier would change to be that
enum member. This causes bugs where a local symbol can have the same
name as an enum member but have a different value. I had assumed this
behavior was removed since but it wasn't, and CI seems to pass having it
removed.
A separate PR needs to be made for the 2.0 branch because these lines
were moved around during a refactoring in #23123 which is not in 2.0.
(cherry picked from commit c101490a0c)
fixes#18125
Previously a tuple type like `(T, int)` would match an expected tuple
type `(U, int)` if `T` is a subtype of `U`. This is wrong since the
codegen does not handle type conversions of individual tuple elements in
a type conversion of an entire tuple. For this reason the compiler
already does not accept `(float, int)` for a matched type `(int, int)`,
however the code that checked for which relations are unacceptable
checked for `< isSubtype` rather than `<= isSubtype`, so subtypes were
not included in the unacceptable relations.
Update: Now only considered unacceptable when inheritance is used, as in
[`paramTypesMatch`](3379d26629/compiler/sigmatch.nim (L2252-L2254)).
Ideally subtype relations that don't need conversions, like `nil`,
`seq[empty]`, `range[0..5]` etc would be their own relation
`isConcreteSubtype` (which would also allow us to differentiate with
`openArray[T]`), but this is too big of a refactor for now.
To compensate for this making things like `let x: (Parent, int) =
(Child(), 0)` not compile (they would crash codegen before anyway but
should still work in principle), type inference for tuple constructors
is updated such that they call `fitNode` on the fields and their
expected types, so a type conversion is generated for the individual
subtype element.
(cherry picked from commit cfd69bad1a)
fixes#23002, fixes#22841, refs comments in #23097
When an identifier is ambiguous in scope (i.e. multiple imports contain
symbols with the same name), attempt resolving it through type inference
(by creating a symchoice). To do this efficiently, `qualifiedLookUp` had
to be broken up so that `semExpr` can access the ambiguous candidates
directly (now obtained directly via `lookUpCandidates`).
This fixes the linked issues, but an example like:
```nim
let on = 123
{.warning[ProveInit]: on.}
```
will still fail, since `on` is unambiguously the local `let` symbol here
(this is also true for `proc on` but `proc` symbols generate symchoices
anyway).
Type symbols are not considered to not confuse the type inference. This
includes the change in sigmatch, up to this point symchoices with
nonoverloadable symbols could be created, they just wouldn't be
considered during disambiguation. Now every proper symbol except types
are considered in disambiguation, so the correct symbols must be picked
during the creation of the symchoice node. I remember there being a
violating case of this in the compiler, but this was very likely fixed
by excluding type symbols as CI seems to have found no issues.
The pure enum ambiguity test was disabled because ambiguous pure enums
now behave like overloadable enums with this behavior, so we get a
longer error message for `echo amb` like `type mismatch: got <MyEnum |
OtherEnum> but expected T`
(cherry picked from commit b280100499)
refs https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/23873#discussion_r1687995060,
fixes#23386, fixes#23385, supersedes #23572
Turns the `nfOpenSym` node flag implemented in #23091 and extended in
containing either `nkSym` or `nkOpenSymChoice`. Since this affects
macros working on generic proc AST, the node kind is now only generated
when the experimental switch `genericsOpenSym` is enabled, and a new
node flag `nfDisabledOpenSym` is set to the `nkSym` or `nkOpenSymChoice`
when the switch is not enabled so that we can give a warning.
Now that the experimental switch has more reasonable semantics, we
define `nimHasGenericsOpenSym2`.
(cherry picked from commit 0c890ff9a7)
actually fixes#23865 following up #23873
In the handling of `nkIdent` in `semExpr`, the compiler looks for the
closest symbol with the name and [checks the symbol
kind](6126a0bf46/compiler/semexprs.nim (L3171))
to also consider the overloads if the symbol kind is overloadable. But
it treats the normally overloadable template/macro/module sym kinds the
same as non-overloadable symbols, just calling `semSym` on it. We need
to mirror this behavior in `semOpenSym`; we treat the captured symchoice
as a fresh identifier, so if the symbol we find is a
template/macro/module, we use that symbol immediately as opposed to
waiting for overloads.
(cherry picked from commit a64aa51fe9)
fixes#23865
The node flag `nfOpenSym` implemented in #23091 for sym nodes is now
also implemented for open symchoices. This means the intended behavior
is still achieved when multiple overloads are in scope to be captured,
so the issue is fixed. The code for the flag is documented and moved
into a helper proc and the experimental switch is now enabled for the
compiler test suite.
(cherry picked from commit 469a6044c0)
fixes#23749, refs #22716
`semIndirectOp` is used here because of the callback expressions, in
this case `db.getProc(...)`, and `semIndirectOp` calls `semOpAux` to
type its arguments before overloading starts. Hence it can opt in to
symchoices since overloading will resolve them.
(cherry picked from commit 948fc29bb2)
refs #22605
Sym choice nodes are now only allowed to pass through semchecking if
contexts ask for them to (with `efAllowSymChoice`). Otherwise they are
resolved or treated as ambiguous. The contexts that can receive
symchoices in this PR are:
* Call operands and addresses and emulations of such, which will subject
them to overload resolution which will resolve them or fail.
* Type conversion operands only for routine symchoices for type
disambiguation syntax (like `(proc (x: int): int)(foo)`), which will
resolve them or fail.
* Proc parameter default values both at the declaration and during
generic instantiation, which undergo type narrowing and so will resolve
them or fail.
This means unless these contexts mess up sym choice nodes should never
leave the semchecking stage. This serves as a blueprint for future
improvements to intermediate symbol resolution.
Some tangential changes are also in this PR:
1. The `AmbiguousEnum` hint is removed, it was always disabled by
default and since #22606 it only started getting emitted after the
symchoice was soundly resolved.
2. Proc setter syntax (`a.b = c` becoming `` `b=`(a, c) ``) used to
fully type check the RHS before passing the transformed call node to
proc overloading. Now it just passes the original node directly so proc
overloading can deal with its typechecking.
(cherry picked from commit 5f9038a5d7)
fixes#23813, partially reverts #23392
Before #23392, if a `gensym` symbol was defined before a proc with the
same name in a template even with an `inject` annotation, the proc would
be `gensym`. After #23392 the proc was instead changed to be `inject` as
long as no `gensym` annotation was given. Now, to keep compatibility
with the old behavior, the behavior is changed back to infer the proc as
`gensym` when no `inject` annotation is given, however an explicit
`inject` annotation will still inject the proc. This is also documented
in the manual as the old behavior was undocumented and the new behavior
is slightly different.
(cherry picked from commit cd946084ab)
fixes#22286
ref https://forum.nim-lang.org/t/10642
For backwards compatibilities, we might need to keep the changes under a
preview compiler flag. Let's see how many packags it break.
**TODO** in the following PRs
- [ ] Turn the `var T` destructors warning into an error with
`nimPreviewNonVarDestructor`
---------
Co-authored-by: Andreas Rumpf <rumpf_a@web.de>
(cherry picked from commit 379299a5ac)
```
$ curl -v http://example.com/404 |& grep 'HTTP/1.1'
> GET /404 HTTP/1.1
< HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error
```
So, the test with http://example.com/404 should be disabled, I think.
(cherry picked from commit c88894bf76)
fixes#23730
Since #23188 the compiler errors when matching a type variable to an
uninstantiated static value. However sometimes an uninstantiated static
value is given even when only a type match is being performed to the
base type of the static type, in the given issue this case is:
```nim
proc foo[T: SomeInteger](x: T): int = int(x)
proc bar(x: static int): array[foo(x), int] = discard
discard bar(123)
```
To deal with this issue we only error when matching against a type
variable constrained to `static`.
Not sure if the `q.typ.kind == tyGenericParam and
q.typ.genericConstraint == tyStatic` check is necessary, the code above
for deciding whether the variable becomes `skConst` doesn't use it.
(cherry picked from commit 128090c593)
fixes#23690
```nim
dest.`:state` = src.`:state`
var :tmp_553651276 = dest.e1.a
`=wasMoved`(dest.e1.a)
dest.e1.a.kind = src.e1.a.kind
case dest.e1.a.kind
of 0:
dest.e1.a.a = src.e1.a.a
of 1:
`=copy`(dest.e1.a.c, src.e1.a.c)
case :tmp_553651276.kind
of 0:
of 1:
`=destroy`(:tmp_553651276.c)
```
`dest.e1.a.kind = src.e1.a.kind` changes the discrimant but it fails to
clear the memory of `dest.e1.a`. Before using hooks for copying, we need
to clear the dest, e.g. `=wasMoved(dest.e1.a.c)`.
```nim
dest.`:state` = src.`:state`
var :tmp_553651276 = dest.e1.a
`=wasMoved`(dest.e1.a)
dest.e1.a.kind = src.e1.a.kind
case dest.e1.a.kind
of 0:
`=wasMoved`(dest.e1.a.a)
dest.e1.a.a = src.e1.a.a
`=wasMoved`(dest.e1.a.b)
of 1:
`=wasMoved`(dest.e1.a.c)
`=copy`(dest.e1.a.c, src.e1.a.c)
case :tmp_553651276.kind
of 0:
of 1:
`=destroy`(:tmp_553651276.c)
```
(cherry picked from commit 262ff648aa)
This adds a version of `almostEqual` (which was already available for
floats) thata works with `Complex[SomeFloat]`.
Proof that this is needed is that the first thing that the complex.nim
runnable examples block did before this commit was define (an
incomplete) `almostEqual` function that worked with complex values.
(cherry picked from commit d8e1504ed1)
fixes#23419
`void` is only supported as fields of objects/tuples. It shouldn't allow
void in the array.
I didn't merge it with taField because that flag is also used for
tyLent, which is allowed in the fields of other types.
(cherry picked from commit 185e06c923)
fixes#23321
In the function `mapType`, ptrs (tyPtr, tyVar, tyLent, tyRef)
are mapped into ctPtrToArray, the dereference of which is skipped
in the `genref`. We need to skip these ptrs in the function
`genOpenArraySlice`.
(cherry picked from commit d09c3c0f58)
fixes#23326
In a routine declaration node in a template, if the routine is marked as
`gensym`, the compiler adds it as a new symbol to a preliminary scope of
the template. If it's not marked as gensym, then it searches the
preliminary scope of the template for the name of the routine, then when
it matches a template parameter or a gensym identifier, the compiler
replaces the name node with a symbol node of the found symbol.
This makes sense for the template parameter since it has to be replaced
later, but not really for the gensym identifier, as it doesn't allow us
to inject a routine with the same name as an identifier previously
declared as gensym (the problem in #23326 is when this is in another
`when` branch).
However this is the only channel to reuse a gensym symbol in a
declaration, so maybe removing it has side effects. For example if we
have:
```nim
proc foo(x: int) {.gensym.} = discard
proc foo(x: float) {.gensym.} = discard
```
it will not behave the same as
```nim
proc foo(x: int) {.gensym.} = discard
proc foo(x: float) = discard
```
behaved previously, which maybe allowed overloading over the gensym'd
symbols.
A note to the "undeclared identifier" error message has also been added
for a potential error code that implicitly depended on the old behavior
might give, namely ``undeclared identifier: 'abc`gensym123'``, which
happens when in a template an identifier is first declared gensym in
code that doesn't compile, then as a routine which injects by default,
then the identifier is used.
(cherry picked from commit 73b0b0d31c)
