fixes#23419
`void` is only supported as fields of objects/tuples. It shouldn't allow
void in the array.
I didn't merge it with taField because that flag is also used for
tyLent, which is allowed in the fields of other types.
fixes#23321
In the function `mapType`, ptrs (tyPtr, tyVar, tyLent, tyRef)
are mapped into ctPtrToArray, the dereference of which is skipped
in the `genref`. We need to skip these ptrs in the function
`genOpenArraySlice`.
When forward declaration is used with pragmas `virtual` or `member`, the
declaration in struct is added twice. It happens because of missing
check for `sfWasForwarded` pragma.
Current compiler generates the following C++ code:
```cpp
struct tyObject_Foo__fFO9b6HU7kRnKB9aJA1RApKw {
N_LIB_PRIVATE N_NOCONV(void, abc)(NI x_p1);
N_LIB_PRIVATE N_NOCONV(virtual void, def)(NI y_p1);
N_LIB_PRIVATE N_NOCONV(void, abc)(NI x_p1);
N_LIB_PRIVATE N_NOCONV(virtual void, def)(NI y_p1);
};
```
fixes#4695
ref https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/15818
Since `nkState` is only for the main loop state labels and `nkGotoState`
is used only for dispatching the `:state` (since
https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/7770), it's feasible to rewrite the
loop body into a single case-based dispatcher, which enables support for
JS, VM backend. `nkState` Node is replaced by a label and Node pair and
`nkGotoState` is only used for intermediary processing. Backends only
need to implement `nkBreakState` and `closureIterSetupExc` to support
closure iterators.
pending https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/23484
<del> I also observed some performance boost for C backend in the
release mode (not in the danger mode though, I suppose the old
implementation is optimized into computed goto in the danger mode)
</del>
allPathsAsgnResult???
fixes#23499
In the
8990626ca9
the effect of `skipAddr` changed to skip `nkAddr` and `nkHiddenAddr`.
Some old code was not adapted. In the
https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/23477, the magic `addr` function
was handled in the semantic analysis phase, which causes it be skipped
incorrectly
fixes#23326
In a routine declaration node in a template, if the routine is marked as
`gensym`, the compiler adds it as a new symbol to a preliminary scope of
the template. If it's not marked as gensym, then it searches the
preliminary scope of the template for the name of the routine, then when
it matches a template parameter or a gensym identifier, the compiler
replaces the name node with a symbol node of the found symbol.
This makes sense for the template parameter since it has to be replaced
later, but not really for the gensym identifier, as it doesn't allow us
to inject a routine with the same name as an identifier previously
declared as gensym (the problem in #23326 is when this is in another
`when` branch).
However this is the only channel to reuse a gensym symbol in a
declaration, so maybe removing it has side effects. For example if we
have:
```nim
proc foo(x: int) {.gensym.} = discard
proc foo(x: float) {.gensym.} = discard
```
it will not behave the same as
```nim
proc foo(x: int) {.gensym.} = discard
proc foo(x: float) = discard
```
behaved previously, which maybe allowed overloading over the gensym'd
symbols.
A note to the "undeclared identifier" error message has also been added
for a potential error code that implicitly depended on the old behavior
might give, namely ``undeclared identifier: 'abc`gensym123'``, which
happens when in a template an identifier is first declared gensym in
code that doesn't compile, then as a routine which injects by default,
then the identifier is used.
fixes#16771
follow up https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/16536
Ideally it should be handled in the IR part in the future
I have also checked the double evaluation of `swap` in the JS runtime
https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/issues/16779, that might be solved by a
copy flag or something. Well, it should be best solved in the IR so that
it doesn't bother backends anymore.
fixes#23399
The new case introduced in #21657 is triggered by `efWantStmt` but the
`when` statement doesn't normally propagate this flag, so propagate it
when the `semCheck` param in `semWhen` is true which happens when the
`when` statement is `efWhenStmt` anyway.
fixes#22284fixes#22282
```
Error: j(uRef, proc (config: F; sources: auto) {.raises: [].} = discard ) can raise an unlisted exception: Exception
```
The problem is that `n.typ.n` contains the effectList which shouldn't
appear in the parameter of a function defintion. We could not simply use
`n.typ.n` as `n[paramsPos]`. The effect lists should be stripped away
anyway.
ref #23354
The new move analyzer requires types that have the tfAsgn flag
(otherwise `lastRead` will return true); tfAsgn is included when the
destructor is not trival. But it should consider the assignement for
objects in this case because objects might have a trival destructors but
it's the assignement that matters when it is passed to sink parameters.
This also prevents unwanted `raises: [ValueError]` effects from bubbling
up from correct format strings which makes `fmt` broadly unusable with
`raises`.
The old runtime-based `formatValue` overloads are kept for
backwards-compatibility, should anyone be using runtime format strings.
---------
Co-authored-by: Andreas Rumpf <rumpf_a@web.de>
This fixes an oversight with a change that I made a while ago.
Basically, these two snippets should both compile. Currently the
`varargs` version will fail.
```nim
template s(d: typed)=discard
proc something()=discard
proc something(x:int)=discard
s(something)
```
```nim
template s(d: varargs[typed])=discard
proc something()=discard
proc something(x:int)=discard
s(something)
```
Potentially unrelated, but this works currently for some reason:
```nim
template s(a: varargs[typed])=discard
proc something()=discard
proc something(x:int)=discard
s:
something
```
also, this works:
```nim
template s(b:untyped, a: varargs[typed])=discard
proc something()=discard
proc something(x:int)=discard
s (g: int):
something
```
but this doesn't, and the error message is not what I would expect:
```nim
template s(b:untyped, a: varargs[typed])=discard
proc something()=discard
proc something(x:int)=discard
s (g: int), something
```
So far as I can tell, none of these issues persist for me after the code
changes in this PR.
fixes#22909
required by https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/23267
```nim
proc foo: string =
assert false
result = ""
```
In the function `foo`, `assert false` raises an exception, which can
cause `result` to be uninitialized if the default result initialization
is optimized out
