Docs are routinely compiled on a different OS so often don't reflect
reality of CT-conditionals.
I bet there's a few of other places like this in the stdlib.
fixes#25014
`implicitConv` tries to instantiate the supertype to convert to,
previously the bindings of `m` was shared with the bindings of the
converter but now an isolated match `convMatch` holds the bindings, so
`convMatch` is now used in the call to `implicitConv` instead of `m` so
that its bindings are used when instantiating the supertype.
fixes#25009
Introduced by #24176, when matching a set type to another, if the given
set is a constructor and the element types match worse than a generic
match (which includes the case with no match), the match is always set
to a convertible match, without checking that it is at least a
convertible match. This is fixed by checking this.
fixes#25000
A failed match on `nfDotField` tries to assert that the name of the dot
field is an identifier node. I am not exactly sure how but at some point
typed generics causes an `nfDotField` call to contain a symchoice for
the field name. The compiler does not use the fact that the field name
is an identifier, so the assert is loosened to allow any identifier-like
node kind. Could also investigate why the symchoice gets created, my
guess is that typed generics detects that the match fails but still
sends it through generic prechecking and doesn't remove the
`nfDotField`, which is harmless and it might cause more trouble to work
around it.
fixes#23713
`linkTo` normally sets the sym of the type as well as the type of the
sym, but this is not wanted for custom pragmas as it would look up the
definition of the generic param and not the definition of its value. I
don't see a practical use for this either.
fxies #24981
`m.g.graph.procGlobals` could change because the right side of `.global`
assignment (e.g. `let a {.global.} = g(T)`) may trigger injections for
unhandled procs
follows up #24871
For subscript assignments, if an overload of `[]=`/`{}=` is not found,
the LHS checks for overloads of `[]`/`{}` as a fallback, similar to what
field setters do since #24871. This is accomplished by just compiling
the LHS if the assignment overloads fail. This has the side effect that
the error messages are different now, instead of displaying the
overloads of `[]=`/`{}=` that did not match, it will display the ones
for `[]`/`{}` instead. This could be fixed by checking for `efLValue`
when giving the error messages for `[]`/`{}` but this is not done here.
The code for `[]` subscripts is a little different because of the
`mArrGet`/`mArrPut` overloads that always match. If the `mArrPut`
overload matches without a builtin subscript behavior for the LHS then
it calls `semAsgn` again with `mode = noOverloadedSubscript`. Before
this meant "fail to compile" but now it means "try to compile the LHS as
normal", in both cases the overloads of `[]=` are not considered again.
fixes#24940fixes#17552
Collects `{.global.}` (i.e. if it was changed into a hook call: `=copy`,
`=sink`) in `injectDestructorCalls` and generates it in the init
sections in cgen
fixes#24947
When injectdestructors detects that a variable is a tuple unpacking temp
(i.e. it is an `skTemp`, is not a cursor, and has tuple type) it does
not generate a destructor for it and only generates sink/bit assignments
for its components. However the reason it does not generate a destructor
is that it expects it to be fully unpacked, this is true for unpackings
in for loops but not for tuple unpacking assignments which supports `_`
since #22537. Tuple unpacking definitions for `var`/`let`/`const` do not
generate `skTemp` and use the same symbol kind as the definition so they
did not have this problem.
To keep this compatible, the `_` parts of the tuple unpacking
assignments are now not ignored and unpacked into `let _ = ...`, which
generates its own destructor. Another option might be to use `skLet`
instead of `skTemp` but this might cause changes to behavior like
additional copies, I am not sure about this though.
todo: We can also give a deprecation message for `ltPtr`/`lePtr`
matching for cstring in `magicsAfterOverloadResolution`
follow up https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/24942
Using `echo` to print file contents to stdout automatically adds a
newline at the end of the file contents. When using nimpretty to auto
format files on save in some editors which replace the file contents
with the formatted ones this means that with every save/format operation
an additional newline is added to the end of the file. Using
`stdout.write` does not automatically add a newline at the end
preventing this issue.
Fixes#24950
explaining why the result may not be so surprising. Clean-up of stray
whitespace and insert of missing "in" along for the ride.
It's just not always faster or slower than `Table`. The difference
depends upon many factors such as (at least!): A) how much (if anything
- for `int` keys it is nothing) hash-comparison before `==` comparison
saves B) how much resizing happens (which may even vary from run to run
if end users are allowed to provide scale guess input), C) how much
comparison happens at all (i.e., table density), D) how much space/size
matters - like how close to a specific deployment "available" cache size
the table is.
If we want, we could add a sentence suggesting performance fans also try
`Table`, but the kind of low-level nature of the explanation strikes me
as already along those lines.
refs #24929, partially reverts #23403
Instead of using `Table[ItemId, T]`, the old algorithm is brought back
into `TIdTable[T]` to prevent a performance regression. The inheritance
removal from #23403 still holds, only `ItemId`s are stored.
In `semExprWithType`: `if result.typ.kind in {tyVar, tyLent}: result =
newDeref(result)` derefed `var`/`lent`. Since it is not done for `sink`,
we need to skip `tySink` in the corresponding procs
Fixes#24895
- Remove all bio handling
- Remove all `sendPendingSslData` which only seems to make things work
by chance
- Wrap the client socket on `acceptAddr` (std/net does this)
- Do the SSL handshake on accept (std/net does this)
The only concern is if addWrite/addRead works well on Windows.
