mirror of
https://github.com/odin-lang/Odin.git
synced 2026-01-10 06:53:03 +00:00
Fix race condition when adding a dependency
This commit is contained in:
@@ -4117,20 +4117,23 @@ bool check_identifier_exists(Scope *s, Ast *node, bool nested = false, Scope **o
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
isize add_dependencies_from_unpacking(CheckerContext *c, Entity **lhs, isize lhs_count, isize tuple_index, isize tuple_count) {
|
||||
if (lhs != nullptr) {
|
||||
if (lhs != nullptr && c->decl != nullptr) {
|
||||
mutex_lock(&c->info->deps_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
for (isize j = 0; (tuple_index + j) < lhs_count && j < tuple_count; j++) {
|
||||
Entity *e = lhs[tuple_index + j];
|
||||
if (e != nullptr) {
|
||||
DeclInfo *decl = decl_info_of_entity(e);
|
||||
if (decl != nullptr) {
|
||||
c->decl = decl; // will be reset by the 'defer' any way
|
||||
for_array(k, decl->deps.entries) {
|
||||
Entity *dep = decl->deps.entries[k].ptr;
|
||||
add_declaration_dependency(c, dep); // TODO(bill): Should this be here?
|
||||
ptr_set_add(&c->decl->deps, dep);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&c->info->deps_mutex);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return tuple_count;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -629,14 +629,16 @@ void check_scope_usage(Checker *c, Scope *scope) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void add_dependency(DeclInfo *d, Entity *e) {
|
||||
void add_dependency(CheckerInfo *info, DeclInfo *d, Entity *e) {
|
||||
mutex_lock(&info->deps_mutex);
|
||||
ptr_set_add(&d->deps, e);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&info->deps_mutex);
|
||||
}
|
||||
void add_type_info_dependency(DeclInfo *d, Type *type) {
|
||||
if (d == nullptr) {
|
||||
// GB_ASSERT(type == t_invalid);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// NOTE(bill): no mutex is required here because the only procedure calling it is wrapped in a mutex already
|
||||
ptr_set_add(&d->type_info_deps, type);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -657,7 +659,7 @@ void add_package_dependency(CheckerContext *c, char const *package_name, char co
|
||||
e->flags |= EntityFlag_Used;
|
||||
GB_ASSERT_MSG(e != nullptr, "%s", name);
|
||||
GB_ASSERT(c->decl != nullptr);
|
||||
ptr_set_add(&c->decl->deps, e);
|
||||
add_dependency(c->info, c->decl, e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void add_declaration_dependency(CheckerContext *c, Entity *e) {
|
||||
@@ -665,7 +667,7 @@ void add_declaration_dependency(CheckerContext *c, Entity *e) {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (c->decl != nullptr) {
|
||||
add_dependency(c->decl, e);
|
||||
add_dependency(c->info, c->decl, e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -300,7 +300,8 @@ struct CheckerInfo {
|
||||
BlockingMutex global_untyped_mutex;
|
||||
BlockingMutex builtin_mutex;
|
||||
|
||||
// NOT recursive & Only used at the end of `check_proc_body`
|
||||
// NOT recursive & only used at the end of `check_proc_body`
|
||||
// and in `add_dependency`.
|
||||
// This is a possible source of contention but probably not
|
||||
// too much of a problem in practice
|
||||
BlockingMutex deps_mutex;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user