mirror of
https://github.com/libsdl-org/SDL.git
synced 2025-09-05 19:08:12 +00:00
Always Use Next Display Index
WIN_AddDisplay asserted that the returned index is the expected next one in the list. This can be an unexpected number when displays are add and removed in a batch (eg, Remote Desktop disconnect and reconnect). Instead always just make use of the next index, even if it is not the expected next index value. This fixes issue #9105
This commit is contained in:
@@ -377,11 +377,10 @@ static void WIN_AddDisplay(_THIS, HMONITOR hMonitor, const MONITORINFOEXW *info,
|
||||
display.driverdata = displaydata;
|
||||
WIN_GetDisplayBounds(_this, &display, &displaydata->bounds);
|
||||
index = SDL_AddVideoDisplay(&display, send_event);
|
||||
SDL_assert(index == *display_index);
|
||||
SDL_free(display.name);
|
||||
|
||||
done:
|
||||
*display_index += 1;
|
||||
*display_index = index + 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
typedef struct _WIN_AddDisplaysData
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user