Commit Graph

294 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
zeertzjq
d65788052f vim-patch:9.1.0650: Coverity warning in cstrncmp() (#29944)
Problem:  Coverity warning in cstrncmp()
          (after v9.1.0645)
Solution: Change the type of n2 to int.
          (zeertzjq)

________________________________________________________________________________________________________
*** CID 1615684:  Integer handling issues  (INTEGER_OVERFLOW)
/src/regexp.c: 1757 in cstrncmp()
1751                 n1 -= mb_ptr2len(s1);
1752                 MB_PTR_ADV(p);
1753                 n2++;
1754             }
1755             // count the number of bytes to advance the same number of chars for s2
1756             p = s2;
>>>     CID 1615684:  Integer handling issues  (INTEGER_OVERFLOW)
>>>     Expression "n2--", which is equal to 18446744073709551615, where "n2" is known to be equal to 0, underflows the type that receives it, an unsigned integer 64 bits wide.
1757             while (n2-- > 0 && *p != NUL)
1758                 MB_PTR_ADV(p);
1759
1760             n2 = p - s2;
1761
1762             result = MB_STRNICMP2(s1, s2, *n, n2);

closes: vim/vim#15409

e8feaa354e
2024-08-01 22:09:23 +00:00
zeertzjq
e57598fbef vim-patch:9.1.0645: regex: wrong match when searching multi-byte char case-insensitive
Problem:  regex: wrong match when searching multi-byte char
          case-insensitive (diffsetter)
Solution: Apply proper case-folding for characters and search-string

This patch does the following 4 things:

1) When the regexp engine compares two utf-8 codepoints case
   insensitive it may match an adjacent character, because it assumes
   it can step over as many bytes as the pattern contains.

   This however is not necessarily true because of case-folding, a
   multi-byte UTF-8 character can be considered equal to some
   single-byte value.

   Let's consider the pattern 'ſ' and the string 's'. When comparing and
   ignoring case, the single character 's' matches, and since it matches
   Vim will try to step over the match (by the amount of bytes of the
   pattern), assuming that since it matches, the length of both strings is
   the same.

   However in that case, it should only step over the single byte value
   's' by 1 byte and try to start matching after it again. So for the
   backtracking engine we need to ensure:
   * we try to match the correct length for the pattern and the text
   * in case of a match, we step over it correctly

   There is one tricky thing for the backtracing engine. We also need to
   calculate correctly the number of bytes to compare the 2 different
   utf-8 strings s1 and s2. So we will count the number of characters in
   s1 that the byte len specified. Then we count the number of bytes to
   step over the same number of characters in string s2 and then we can
   correctly compare the 2 utf-8 strings.

2) A similar thing can happen for the NFA engine, when skipping to the
   next character to test for a match. We are skipping over the regstart
   pointer, however we do not consider the case that because of
   case-folding we may need to adjust the number of bytes to skip over.
   So this needs to be adjusted in find_match_text() as well.

3) A related issue turned out, when prog->match_text is actually empty.
   In that case we should try to find the next match and skip this
   condition.

4) When comparing characters using collections, we must also apply case
   folding to each character in the collection and not just to the
   current character from the search string.  This doesn't apply to the
   NFA engine, because internally it converts collections to branches
   [abc] -> a\|b\|c

fixes: vim/vim#14294
closes: vim/vim#14756

22e8e12d9f

N/A patches:
vim-patch:9.0.1771: regex: combining chars in collections not handled
vim-patch:9.0.1777: patch 9.0.1771 causes problems

Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
2024-07-31 08:03:31 +08:00
zeertzjq
17f95fe79b vim-patch:9.0.0105: illegal memory access when pattern starts with illegal byte
Problem:    Illegal memory access when pattern starts with illegal byte.
Solution:   Do not match a character with an illegal byte.

f50940531d

Co-authored-by: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org>
2024-07-31 08:03:30 +08:00
zeertzjq
e83949f96c vim-patch:9.0.0414: matchstr() still does not match column offset
Problem:    matchstr() still does not match column offset when done after a
            text search.
Solution:   Only use the line number for a multi-line search.  Fix the test.
            (closes vim/vim#10938)

753aead960

Co-authored-by: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org>
2024-07-17 11:04:55 +08:00
zeertzjq
ccdbab7810 vim-patch:9.0.0407: matchstr() does match column offset
Problem:    matchstr() does match column offset. (Yasuhiro Matsumoto)
Solution:   Accept line number zero. (closes vim/vim#10938)

75a115e8d6

Co-authored-by: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org>
2024-07-17 11:04:55 +08:00
zeertzjq
dce615bc42 vim-patch:9.0.0228: crash when pattern looks below the last line
Problem:    Crash when pattern looks below the last line.
Solution:   Consider invalid lines to be empty. (closes vim/vim#10938)

13ed494bb5

Comment out the test as it uses Vim9 script and text properties.

Co-authored-by: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org>
2024-07-17 11:04:50 +08:00
Lewis Russell
43d8435cf8 revert: "refactor: use S_LEN macro" (#29319)
revert: "refactor: use S_LEN(s) instead of s, n (#29219)"

This reverts commit c37695a5d5.
2024-06-14 05:20:06 +08:00
bfredl
39d8651283 Merge pull request #29278 from bfredl/strcat
refactor(memory): use builtin strcat() instead of STRCAT()
2024-06-11 19:21:50 +02:00
James
c37695a5d5 refactor: use S_LEN(s) instead of s, n (#29219) 2024-06-11 16:40:24 +01:00
bfredl
bbd2f340a2 refactor(memory): use builtin strcat() instead of STRCAT()
The latter was mostly relevant with the past char_u madness.

NOTE: STRCAT also functioned as a counterfeit "NOLINT" for clint
apparently. But NOLINT-ing every usecase is just the same as disabling
the check entirely.
2024-06-11 14:53:52 +02:00
James Tirta Halim
a18982cb83 refactor: replace '\0' with NUL 2024-06-04 09:42:19 +01:00
Justin M. Keyes
bb6190bec5 refactor: move shared messages to errors.h #26214 2024-06-01 08:19:41 -07:00
zeertzjq
c836383d21 vim-patch:9.1.0438: Wrong Ex command executed when :g uses '?' as delimiter (#28956)
Problem:  Wrong Ex command executed when :g uses '?' as delimiter and
          pattern contains escaped '?'.
Solution: Don't use "*newp" when it's not allocated (zeertzjq).

closes: vim/vim#14837

3074137542
2024-05-24 15:04:33 +08:00
zeertzjq
e7859d2ad5 vim-patch:9.1.0436: Crash when using '?' as separator for :s (#28955)
Problem:  Crash when using '?' as separator for :s and pattern contains
          escaped '?'s (after 9.1.0409).
Solution: Always compute startplen. (zeertzjq).

related: neovim/neovim#28935
closes: 14832

789679cfc4
2024-05-24 05:57:00 +08:00
zeertzjq
0e187fe038 vim-patch:9.1.0409: too many strlen() calls in the regexp engine (#28857)
Problem:  too many strlen() calls in the regexp engine
Solution: refactor code to retrieve strlen differently, make use
          of bsearch() for getting the character class
          (John Marriott)

closes: vim/vim#14648

82792db631

Cherry-pick keyvalue_T and its comparison functions from patch 9.1.0256.

vim-patch:9.1.0410: warning about uninitialized variable
vim-patch:9.1.0412: typo in regexp_bt.c in DEBUG code

Co-authored-by: John Marriott <basilisk@internode.on.net>
2024-05-20 12:42:57 +08:00
dundargoc
7acf39ddab docs: misc (#28609)
Closes https://github.com/neovim/neovim/issues/28484.
Closes https://github.com/neovim/neovim/issues/28719.

Co-authored-by: Chris <crwebb85@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gregory Anders <greg@gpanders.com>
Co-authored-by: Jake B <16889000+jakethedev@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Raines <jonathan.s.raines@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yi Ming <ofseed@foxmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Zane Dufour <zane@znd4.me>
Co-authored-by: zeertzjq <zeertzjq@outlook.com>
2024-05-15 07:18:33 +08:00
zeertzjq
0ea38c9a53 refactor: add xmemcpyz() and use it in place of some xstrlcpy() (#28422)
Problem:  Using xstrlcpy() when the exact length of the string to be
          copied is known is not ideal because it requires adding 1 to
          the length and an unnecessary strlen().
Solution: Add xmemcpyz() and use it in place of such xstrlcpy() calls.
2024-04-20 19:31:00 +08:00
zeertzjq
f6a3fdd684 refactor: fix clang NonNullParamChecker warnings (#28327) 2024-04-14 21:48:32 +08:00
zeertzjq
d0afb2dc4e vim-patch:9.1.0297: Patch 9.1.0296 causes too many issues (#28263)
Problem:  Patch 9.1.0296 causes too many issues
          (Tony Mechelynck, chdiza, CI)
Solution: Back out the change for now

Revert "patch 9.1.0296: regexp: engines do not handle case-folding well"

This reverts commit 7a27c108e0509f3255ebdcb6558e896c223e4d23 it causes
issues with syntax highlighting and breaks the FreeBSD and MacOS CI. It
needs more work.

fixes: vim/vim#14487

c97f4d61cd

Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
2024-04-11 07:40:16 +08:00
zeertzjq
f49408454d vim-patch:9.1.0296: regexp: engines do not handle case-folding well (#28259)
Problem:  Regex engines do not handle case-folding well
Solution: Correctly calculate byte length of characters to skip

When the regexp engine compares two utf-8 codepoints case insensitively
it may match an adjacent character, because it assumes it can step over
as many bytes as the pattern contains.

This however is not necessarily true because of case-folding, a
multi-byte UTF-8 character can be considered equal to some single-byte
value.

Let's consider the pattern 'ſ' and the string 's'. When comparing and
ignoring case, the single character 's' matches, and since it matches
Vim will try to step over the match (by the amount of bytes of the
pattern), assuming that since it matches, the length of both strings is
the same.

However in that case, it should only step over the single byte
value 's' so by 1 byte and try to start matching after it again. So for the
backtracking engine we need to ensure:
- we try to match the correct length for the pattern and the text
- in case of a match, we step over it correctly

The same thing can happen for the NFA engine, when skipping to the next
character to test for a match. We are skipping over the regstart
pointer, however we do not consider the case that because of
case-folding we may need to adjust the number of bytes to skip over. So
this needs to be adjusted in find_match_text() as well.

A related issue turned out, when prog->match_text is actually empty. In
that case we should try to find the next match and skip this condition.

fixes: vim/vim#14294
closes: vim/vim#14433

7a27c108e0

Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
2024-04-10 07:08:49 +08:00
zeertzjq
6364fc617d vim-patch:9.1.0217: regexp: verymagic cannot match before/after a mark (#28074)
Problem:  regexp: verymagic cannot match before/after a mark
Solution: Correctly check for the very magic check (Julio B)

Fix regexp parser for \v%>'m and \v%<'m
Currently \v%'m works fine, but it is unable to match before or after
the position of mark m.

closes: vim/vim#14309

46fa3c7e27

Co-authored-by: Julio B <julio.bacel@gmail.com>
2024-03-28 18:15:41 +08:00
zeertzjq
b2f7a3aaad vim-patch:9.1.0105: Style: typos found (#27462)
Problem:  Style: typos found
Solution: correct them
          (zeertzjq)

closes: vim/vim#14023

e71022082d
2024-02-14 06:39:47 +08:00
zeertzjq
dc466f9a63 vim-patch:9.1.0043: ml_get: invalid lnum when :s replaces visual selection (#27140)
Problem:  ml_get: invalid lnum when :s replaces visual selection
          (@ropery)
Solution: substitute may decrement the number of lines in a buffer,
          so validate, that the bottom lines of the visual selection
          stays within the max buffer line

fixes: vim/vim#13890
closes: vim/vim#13892

7c71db3a58

Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
2024-01-23 06:51:10 +08:00
zeertzjq
3bcf8e5622 vim-patch:9.1.0011: regexp cannot match combining chars in collection (#26992)
Problem:  regexp cannot match combining chars in collection
Solution: Check for combining characters in regex collections for the
          NFA and BT Regex Engine

Also, while at it, make debug mode work again.

fixes vim/vim#10286
closes: vim/vim#12871

d2cc51f9a1

Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
2024-01-12 14:09:10 +08:00
dundargoc
1813661a61 refactor(IWYU): fix headers
Remove `export` pramgas from defs headers as it causes IWYU to believe
that the definitions from the defs headers comes from main header, which
is not what we really want.
2024-01-11 21:37:23 +01:00
zeertzjq
583c1de175 refactor: move structs from regexp_defs.h to regexp.c (#26899)
These structs are only used in other source files as pointers and their
fields aren't accessed in other source files.
2024-01-05 22:26:07 +08:00
dundargoc
b49d4e18a6 refactor: remove redundant NOLINT comments 2024-01-01 19:57:44 +01:00
dundargoc
eae6727325 refactor: remove os_errmsg and os_msg functions
Instead replace them with fprintf and printf.
2023-12-23 14:00:09 +01:00
dundargoc
af93a74a0f refactor: run IWYU on entire repo
Reference: https://github.com/neovim/neovim/issues/6371.
2023-12-21 17:38:42 +01:00
zeertzjq
543e0256c1 build: don't define FUNC_ATTR_* as empty in headers (#26317)
FUNC_ATTR_* should only be used in .c files with generated headers.
Defining FUNC_ATTR_* as empty in headers causes misuses of them to be
silently ignored. Instead don't define them by default, and only define
them as empty after a .c file has included its generated header.
2023-11-30 15:51:05 +08:00
dundargoc
79b6ff28ad refactor: fix headers with IWYU 2023-11-28 22:23:56 +01:00
dundargoc
6c14ae6bfa refactor: rename types.h to types_defs.h 2023-11-27 21:57:51 +01:00
dundargoc
f4aedbae4c build(IWYU): fix includes for undo_defs.h 2023-11-27 19:33:17 +01:00
dundargoc
8b428ca8b7 build(IWYU): fix includes for func_attr.h 2023-11-27 18:06:57 +01:00
dundargoc
a827003e30 build: rework IWYU mapping files
Create mapping to most of the C spec and some POSIX specific functions.
This is more robust than relying files shipped with IWYU.
2023-11-25 17:41:33 +01:00
dundargoc
4880385809 build: adjust clang-tidy warning exclusion logic
Enable all clang-tidy warnings by default instead of disabling them.
This ensures that we don't miss useful warnings on each clang-tidy
version upgrade. A drawback of this is that it will force us to either
fix or adjust the warnings as soon as possible.
2023-11-20 20:05:43 +01:00
dundargoc
a6e3d93421 refactor: enable formatting for ternaries
This requires removing the "Inner expression should be aligned" rule
from clint as it prevents essentially any formatting regarding ternary
operators.
2023-11-20 19:57:09 +01:00
dundargoc
1798a4b5e9 build: bump uncrustify version
Biggest change is that uncrustify is silent during linting.
2023-11-19 15:03:07 +01:00
zeertzjq
6952b1951b vim-patch:9.0.2107: [security]: FPE in adjust_plines_for_skipcol (#26082)
Problem:  [security]: FPE in adjust_plines_for_skipcol
Solution: don't divide by zero, return zero

Prevent a floating point exception when calculating w_skipcol (which can
happen with a small window when the number option is set and cpo+=n).

Add a test to verify

cb0b99f067

Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
2023-11-17 08:40:02 +08:00
zeertzjq
d2f2e2725c vim-patch:9.0.1532: crash when expanding "~" in substitute causes very long text
Problem:    Crash when expanding "~" in substitute causes very long text.
Solution:   Limit the text length to MAXCOL.

ab9a2d884b

Co-authored-by: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org>
2023-11-17 07:06:52 +08:00
zeertzjq
bb4b4576e3 refactor: iwyu (#26062) 2023-11-16 10:55:54 +08:00
dundargoc
353a4be7e8 build: remove PVS
We already have an extensive suite of static analysis tools we use,
which causes a fair bit of redundancy as we get duplicate warnings. PVS
is also prone to give false warnings which creates a lot of work to
identify and disable.
2023-11-12 21:26:39 +01:00
dundargoc
8e58d37f2e refactor: remove redundant casts 2023-11-11 13:31:17 +01:00
dundargoc
acc646ad8f refactor: the long goodbye
long is 32 bits on windows, while it is 64 bits on other architectures.
This makes the type suboptimal for a codebase meant to be
cross-platform. Replace it with more appropriate integer types.
2023-11-05 20:19:06 +01:00
dundargoc
4d757bbfbb refactor: combine regexp files
regext_bt.c and regexp_nfa.c are inlined into regexp.c instead of
included as a header. This makes developer tools like clang-tidy and
clangd be able to understand the code better.
2023-11-05 11:48:42 +01:00
dundargoc
8e932480f6 refactor: the long goodbye
long is 32 bits on windows, while it is 64 bits on other architectures.
This makes the type suboptimal for a codebase meant to be
cross-platform. Replace it with more appropriate integer types.
2023-10-09 11:45:46 +02:00
zeertzjq
dc6d0d2daf refactor: reorganize option header files (#25437)
- Move vimoption_T to option.h
- option_defs.h is for option-related types
- option_vars.h corresponds to Vim's option.h
- option_defs.h and option_vars.h don't include each other
2023-09-30 14:41:34 +08:00
zeertzjq
cf8b2c0e74 build(iwyu): add a few more _defs.h mappings (#25435) 2023-09-30 12:05:28 +08:00
bfredl
bc13bc154a refactor(message): smsg_attr -> smsg 2023-09-29 16:36:04 +02:00
zeertzjq
bbde37fd64 vim-patch:9.0.1908: undefined behaviour upper/lower function ptrs (#25238)
Problem:  undefined behaviour upper/lower function ptrs
Solution: Fix UBSAN error in regexp and simplify upper/lowercase
          modifier code

The implementation of \u / \U / \l / \L modifiers in the substitute
command relies on remembering the state by setting function pointers on
func_all/func_one in the code. The code signature of `fptr_T` is
supposed to return void* (due to C function signatures not being able to
return itself due to type recursion), and the definition of the
functions (e.g. to_Upper) didn't follow this rule, and so the code tries
to cast functions of different signatures, resulting in undefined
behavior error under UBSAN in Clang 17. See vim/vim#12745.

We could just fix `do_Upper`/etc to just return void*, which would fix
the problem. However, these functions actually do not need to return
anything at all. It used to be the case that there was only one pointer
"func" to store the pointer, which is why the function needs to either
return itself or NULL to indicate whether it's a one time or ongoing
modification. However, c2c355df6f094cdb9e599fd395a78c14486ec697
(7.3.873) already made that obsolete by introducing `func_one` and
`func_all` to store one-time and ongoing operations separately, so these
functions don't actually need to return anything anymore because it's
implicit whether it's a one-time or ongoing operation. Simplify the code
to reflect that.

closes: vim/vim#13117

d25021cf03

Co-authored-by: Yee Cheng Chin <ychin.git@gmail.com>
2023-09-19 06:41:59 +08:00